Opinion | The Stalinist Model of the Radical Left Israel today

terrorism.

This is Netanyahu's way.

no less.

This is how Zehava Gal-On scrolled through the pages of the Haaretz newspaper.

"Stochastic terrorism" in its exact definition.

And what, she says, are the terrorist acts of opposition leader Netanyahu? Well, he is speaking. Speaking here, speaking there, in its wording "participates in every possible act of incitement."

He is not only speaking out against Naftali Bennett - "my prime minister in the deepest sense possible" - he also refuses to acknowledge his legitimacy, as he did towards the late Yitzhak Rabin. On the Capitol Hill of the Knesset, but he, in his words, is responsible for that murder and the next one.

The former Meretz chairman could have spared and converted her article into one Stalin sentence: “If the opposition disarms, all is well and good. If not, we should help her. "As with Netanyahu, Stalin's opponents' weapon was speech. They criticized the revolution, they publicly accepted the policy. And how did Stalin help them lay down that weapon? Well, he tortured them, sent them to the Gulag and most importantly. Executed them.Also he did not skip the stage of the Attorney General.Andrei Vishinsky conducted at a high level show trials, in which opponents of the regime were forced to confess to their "crimes" before death. As in the Inquisition. Confess, kiss the cross and then of course burn you.

This article by Galon reflects the anti-democratic abyss into which the radical left is sweeping Israel. For just as science will be defined as such only if it can be refuted, as Karl Popper argued - so democracy will be such, only if it can be criticized. Democracy without coalition-opposition relations is not democracy. In this abyss, laws such as that of Saar, or the document of the ombudsman's instructions, which transfer us from democracy to autocracy, also come to mind.

Netanyahu stood on that balcony, like the great Democrats who criticized the government in public, without fear.

He did not agree to stand aside when 1,500 of his people were massacred in the streets, nor did he agree to call them victims of peace.

He saw them, and rightly so, as victims of Rabin's policies.

Had he not been assassinated, Rabin would have been defeated by a huge margin, as polls then taught, as a vast majority of the people saw the Oslo Accords as the destruction of Jerusalem.

But the people are not interested in Galon.

In her article, too, she does not address the people, but the attorney general.

The one who previously announced that he was considering exposing Netanyahu to "substantial fortification," another concept borrowed from Orwell 1984.

Today, as then, Netanyahu recognizes the legitimacy of the government, but refrains from normalizing the anti-democratic political act that established it.

And that what is more democratic than opposition to a government formed in fraud and plagiarism of its constituents?

Moral legitimacy footage for a prime minister with zero public support?

But classic democracy is baboons.

Gal-On demands, as in any "popular democracy," that Netanyahu remain silent and bow to the emperor.

The false prophecies of the Assault on Capitol Hill, such as the well-known facts that Netanyahu has on countless occasions withheld the traitor's calls against Rabin - do not prevent Gal-On from deliberately turning all opponents of the regime into potential assassins, for one purpose - silencing criticism.

The method is not new, it is an integral part of the adoption of the Stalinist model.

Still allowed to be surprised anew by the boldness of the forehead.

This must have happened to you, readers, when you recently heard the senior police chief reveal that it was actually Galon's friends from Balfour - carrying the black flags, guillotines and hanging ropes - that police intelligence forces prevented them from breaking into the prime minister's house, even though they had planned it carefully.

Of course, to save democracy.