America is in turmoil these days.
No, it's not (just) rising inflation, empty shelves of writers and rising fuel prices, inversely related to the free dive into President Biden's support rates.
These days, the last layers are being peeled off in what has for years earned the exploding description of the "conspiracy between Trump and Putin": an issue that tore America to shreds, centered on the narrative that the former US president is a "puppet" of the Russian president, and even "traitor" in his own country.
Even in real time, there were doubts among the conservative media in the US about the veracity of the fantastic reports about Trump's exploits in Russia, for which he was "held in the throat" by Putin. Watergate on steroids - the conspiracy against Trump is exposed. "These doubts were ridiculed and criticized by the American media, which despises Trump in the intensities of competition only for the disgust of the Israeli media to Netanyahu.
Former US President Trump, Photo: AP
These days it turns out that the FBI also knew in real time, in the early stages of the events, that not only was "nothing because there was nothing" about the conspiracy, but that those who spread the lies against Trump were members of the Democratic Party - his political rivals.
The special investigator appointed during the Trump era to investigate the issue, John Durham, is starting to produce results these days, and is filing jaw-dropping indictments against the people who concocted the plot - one of whom is a senior attorney from the Clinton campaign.
Most U.S. media outlets that have constantly injected the American public with the "conspiracy" poison almost completely ignore the sensational revelations - but there are still some righteous people in Sodom: The Washington Post recently began taking "unconventional steps and removing large sections" of articles that covered The story: Even former FBI and Obama administration officials, who approved the initial surveillance against Trump, are beating (in part) a sin.
In Israel, the State Attorney's Office and its media branches have not yet said desperate about the 4000 case - the "conspiracy" between Netanyahu and Elowitz.
The prosecution's parade of failures so far in the trial, as well as the judges' most critical comments, are hardly covered, and now our country's journalist wants to present state witness Nir Hefetz, who will appear on the podium the next day, as a savior who overthrows Netanyahu.
The facts, in this case, are less important: "The testimony of Nir Hefetz, which will begin this week, is the most important testimony regarding Netanyahu's awareness of the alleged bribery relationship with Elovich," writes Baruch Kara, News 13's legal commentator and columnist at Walla.
According to Kara: "Therefore, at the end of his testimony, unlike all the scribbled assessments so far, we will be able to assess Netanyahu's condition in the 4000 case."
Netanyahu, Photo: Oren Ben Hakon
Kara's arrogance and rulings were apparently intended to make his readers forget the catastrophe experienced by the prosecution in the testimony of Ilan Yeshua, former Walla CEO. It was none other than the main prosecutor against Netanyahu, Adv. The bribe: In her opening speech at the trial, Ben-Ari stated that "without salvation he kept his cell phone," the prosecution did not have "real-time evidence" that it said "established the existence of a reasonable suspicion of committing bribery offenses" between Netanyahu and Elowitz.
Ben-Ari added that Yeshua was the man on whom a "real pressure cooker" was used by the Elowitz couple to serve Netanyahu.
The testimony of salvation, as stated, has passed her by, and it is undisputed that the main beneficiaries of it were Netanyahu and the Elowitz couple.
If so, Aliba Dakra, the chief prosecutor in the Netanyahu trial is one of those who circulated "scribbled assessments" regarding the former prime minister's situation in the 4000 case.
Another journalist, Gidi Weitz from Haaretz, published a long article last weekend in preparation for Hefetz's testimony, with a bombastic headline: "The man who served the three most powerful people in the country is about to tell how the system works."
Elovich, Photo: Oren Ben Hakon
According to Weitz, Hefetz will describe in his testimony "how the criminal relationship between the former prime minister and Bezeq's controlling shareholder came about." , And claimed that in this election the trend of protecting the Netanyahu couple increased and "the public relations machine continued to operate."
Well, at first the prosecution adopted Weitz's narrative, and in the letter of suspicion, Mandelblit did claim that Netanyahu received "favorable and positive coverage" in Walla - but as time went on, the prosecution also realized that Netanyahu's attitude was very hostile, and the narrative began to change: not the actual fan coverage is the issue , But requests for fan coverage.
And if not a fan, then at least non-negative.
At a certain point, the wording for "opening a door to the Walla website" was even lowered.
If so, Weitz's thesis collapsed slowly, but that did not stop him from continuing to feed the bribe bear - with the spirit of Gabi from Saladin.