The long process surrounding the third IPO of Telekom 2000 could come to an end with a settlement.
The proposal is due to be discussed in the coming week.
Frankfurt / Main - The longstanding investor protection process surrounding the so-called third IPO of Deutsche Telekom AG in 2000 could be ended by a settlement.
A proposal is on the table that is supported by the model plaintiff and other aggrieved investors as well as the defendant Deutsche Telekom AG, the Federal Republic of Germany and the state bank KfW.
The Frankfurt Higher Regional Court announced on Monday.
The proposal is to be discussed between the parties to the dispute on Tuesday next week (23 November).
also read
British soldiers on duty from Monday
Refueling is currently a major problem in Great Britain: there is a lack of fuel.
The UK government wants to remedy the situation.
British soldiers on duty from Monday
Former concentration camp secretary has to be in custody after trying to escape
The Itzehoe Regional Court spent months preparing what was possibly the last Nazi trial in Germany.
But then the main character is missing: the 96-year-old defendant first has to be caught by the police.
Former concentration camp secretary has to be in custody after trying to escape
Corona process: the state could waive the statute of limitations
In the compensation proceedings for corona infections in the ski resort of Ischgl, Austria's legal representatives have for the first time offered the prospect of a possible concession.
There is the possibility for the state to waive the statute of limitations for the claims of ill Ischgl visitors, they said on Friday in the regional court for civil law matters in Vienna.
Corona process: the state could waive the statute of limitations
Behind the model case are around 16,000 small shareholders who are suing, demanding compensation for the exchange rate losses they have suffered in the amount of around 80 million euros, which Telekom has so far refused.
Their lawsuits had been combined into a model investor procedure that had already been negotiated twice at the Frankfurt Higher Regional Court.
However, the Federal Court of Justice had made a third hearing in Frankfurt necessary on one sub-issue.
dpa
