Eric Zemmour's remarks in front of the Bataclan continue to generate a reaction.
After François Hollande, Manuel Valls and many other political figures, Marine Le Pen reacted on Monday, November 15 to the controversial release of the essayist.
Saturday 13, after being collected in front of the Parisian concert hall, where 90 people fell under the bullets of the terrorists in 2015, the quasi-presidential candidate accused François Hollande of "not having protected the French" and of 'having taken "
a criminal decision to leave the borders open
".
To discover
Presidential 2022: where are the candidates in the polls?
Read also François Hollande, abnormal witness at the November 13 trial
For the candidate of the National Assembly in the presidential election, if there are “
of course
” “
things to say about the opening of the borders
”, the exit of the polemicist was not appropriate.
"
The problem of Eric Zemmour is that he is a polemicist and he knows nothing to do other than to argue
", she introduced on France Info.
Before adding: “
There are places which are places of suffering, which are places of martyrs.
These are not places of controversy
”.
"A form of brutality" that she regrets
For Marine Le Pen, the situation of the essayist "
is fundamentally different
" from that of Donald Trump, to whom he is often compared.
"
Trump was at the head of the gigantic Republican party while Zemmour presents himself without a political structure around him,
" she argues.
Read also Presidential 2022: between Zemmour and Le Pen, Marion Maréchal pleads for "a single candidacy behind the best placed"
She also regrets that Eric Zemmour comes "to
say things with a form of brutality
". "
When we speak loudly and speak brutally, we are sometimes better understood than when we speak in a reasonable manner
," she said. But, according to her, "
there is no longer any need to speak with this brutality
" since "
90% of the French
" agree with the migratory problem and that of political Islam.
"
What is the point of speaking loudly, if not to create division where we have succeeded in creating unanimity?"
", She asks, considering also that the polemicist does not have"
a single specific proposal
"to fight against immigration and Islamist fundamentalism.
