The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Alternate residence: "The judge of Reims does not decide like that of Lille who does not decide like that of Paris"

2021-11-17T18:57:20.212Z


INTERVIEW - Barbara Régent is a lawyer specializing in family law. In Le Figaro, she explains why there is no "national unity" on this subject.


LE FIGARO.

-

On November 10, a group of parents started a march from Marseille to Paris to denounce “parental inequality”.

They are asking for changes in the law, particularly concerning alternating residence, which they would like to see established as a “

basic principle

” at the time of separation.

That is to say systematized?

Master Barbara REGENT.

-

No, making it a basic principle is simply asking the judges to examine it as a matter of priority, on the basis that it is the most equitable form of care for children and parents.

And to provide reasons if they rule it out.

Read alsoFrom Marseille to Paris, fathers march to denounce "parental inequality"

According to INSEE, 12% of children of separated parents are affected by this type of care.

To consider that

"

this is not enough

"

, it is necessary to think that the alternating residence is a progress to be encouraged.

How do you think this is the case?

For a child, the ideal situation “

it's mom and dad who love each other and stay together for life

”.

In real life, where nearly one in two couples go their separate ways,

This article is for subscribers only.

You have 81% left to discover.

To cultivate your freedom is to cultivate your curiosity.

Subscription without obligation

1 € THE FIRST MONTH

Already subscribed?

Log in

Source: lefigaro

All news articles on 2021-11-17

You may like

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.