The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Renovate the entertainment circle. Four | After an artist is banned, can live performances be "not enough to be a public figure"?

2021-11-21T00:45:47.584Z


"Hong Kong 01" recently compiled a list of "artist dispute incidents" in the mainland performing arts circle in the past 20 years, focusing on the current impact of the controversial incident on the artist's performing arts career. Robert Downey


"Hong Kong 01" recently compiled a list of "artist dispute incidents" in the mainland performing arts circle in the past 20 years, focusing on the current impact of the controversial incident on the artist's career.


Robert John Downey Jr. (Robert John Downey Jr.) still used "Iron Man" (Iron Man) to revive his acting career after his third drug addict.

What is curious is whether these mainland artists can also rely on their talents and strength to come back to the scene three or five years after the incident?


Song Dongye a few days ago complained that after the "three-year ban", he was still frequently reported by the public to cancel commercial performances. The official media responded that "continue to be a public figure, no", is it a signal that the controversial artist's chances of coming back again have diminished in the future? ?

How long is the "prohibition period for inferior artists" in the mainland?

Is it true that the prodigal son can't change his head when he turns his head?


The degree of bans varies and how long the ban lasts "no clear regulations"

According to the "List of Artistic Disputes" previously released by "Hong Kong 01", artists involved in different types of disputes, and the degree of impact on their acting career will also vary significantly.

After encountering "banned performances", "banned performances and works removed from the shelves", "completely banned" (even the social accounts are cancelled), can the artist not stand up?

+4

Song Dongye issued a long article a few days ago, quoting from the Ministry of Culture's "Notice on Further Strengthening the Management of Commercial Performances" and mentioned that after two years after the "three-year ban on performances" stipulated in the notice, he still suffers from reports and performances. To be cancelled is to "deprive them of their right to work reasonably and legally."

This also made the "three-year" and "five-year" ban period a hot topic of public discussion, but the reporter of "Hong Kong 01" checked the "Notice on Further Strengthening the Management of Commercial Performances" and related information, but could not find the words " "Three-year ban on performances".

Song Dongye's unique folk music style is not only popular in the Mainland, but also has many fans in Hong Kong and Taiwan.

(Photo by Huang Haojin)

Weibo internet celebrity "@草帽写书BOT" also pointed out that the "three-year ban period" did not appear in the "Regulations on the Management of Commercial Performances," the main document aimed at regulating commercial performances.

The netizen believes that the earliest version of "Regulations on the Administration of Commercial Performances" in 1998 mentioned that "drug abuse or compulsory drug rehabilitation will not be issued for performance certificates within one year."

According to his analysis, according to mainland law, the mandatory detoxification period is two years. It is speculated that the "two years" of the detoxification period plus the "one year" mentioned in the regulations constitute Song Dongye's so-called "three-year ban on performances."

However, Song Dongye's argument that "I have become a better person" does not seem to be accepted by the government, and there are also criticisms from the public.

With regard to the re-emergence of "drug addicts", the internet public opinion in the Mainland has been criticized loudly.

In March of this year, a deputies to the National People's Congress suggested that "drug use should be banned for life."

Coinciding with the rectification of the entertainment industry this year, the "Notice on Regulating Performance Brokerage and Strengthening Actor Management to Promote the Healthy and Orderly Development of the Performance Market" issued by the Ministry of Culture and Tourism in September clearly stated that "Performance activities shall not be used, causing adverse social impacts." Illegal and unethical actors", but did not indicate the length of the ban.

After Li Xiaolu earned 40 million yuan, online live broadcast was also regulated

Physical performances are governed by the "Regulations on Commercial Management Performances", what about the online ones?

Li Xiaolu, who was involved in a "moral controversy" due to a scandal with PGone, began to sell goods live on the online platform in April last year, attracting many netizens to watch.

The launch of Li Xiaolu's live broadcast to bring goods has also triggered various discussions on the Internet about whether to prohibit the live broadcast of "inferior artists". It has also been reported that government agencies have interviewed platforms such as Kuaishou and Douyin to prohibit specific artists from live streaming.

In November of that year, the State Administration of Radio, Film and Television issued the "Notice on Strengthening the Management of Online Show Live and E-commerce Live Broadcasting", which mentioned that artists who "illegal and unethical" should be prohibited from participating in the live broadcast business. Like the Regulations, there is no mention of the length of the prohibition.

However, the two documents also use the four words "violating the law and demerit", showing that "moral disputes" and "violation of laws and regulations" are also sufficient conditions for artists to be banned.

In general, under the control of physical performance venues and webcasting, as long as an artist becomes "bad" in the future, whether it is five years, ten years or fifty years, the chance of a comeback is slim.

Renovation of the entertainment circle, one | Liu Xiaoqing and Fan Bingbing have different lives with others?

The new order of the entertainment circle after the three waves of horrific moves will rectify the entertainment circle.

2. Ke Zhendong's drug use is the beginning and the ban is getting stricter just because "Your circle is too messy"?

Renovate the entertainment circle.

Three | Nicholas Tse abandons foreign nationals due to restrictions on nationality?

Catch the red line of the invisible "political atmosphere"

There are still business opportunities for controversial artists to act low-key

Both the Internet and physical performances are blocked, so how can these artists make a living? Huang Haibo, who has appeared in "The Beautiful Times of Daughter-in-law" and became famous for his acting skills, has won the Magnolia Award Winner.

In 2014, he was in custody and education for six months due to prostitution.

This ruined the way of performing arts, and to this day, there are still many people who are unfair to him.

After that, he gave an "acting class" to teach acting skills and train new actors, which is said to be very popular.

In addition, in 2019, Zhao Lixin, who was involved in political controversy when asked "Why did the Japanese occupy Beijing not snatch the cultural relics from the Forbidden City?"

It is understood that he opened a "drama bar" and played some sketches by himself, and he was addicted to foot drama.

In addition to relying on professionalism to make a living, the path of small business performances and fan economy is not completely blocked.

PGone, which is involved in moral controversy, was frequently reported on business performances during the storm in 2020, and the road to comeback seemed difficult.

However, at the end of 2020, he released a personal physical album, the album is priced at 398 yuan, and the limited edition is as high as 1999 yuan, but there are still many fans willing to pay, and the total sales volume is as high as 30 million yuan.

Song Dongye, who had been reported earlier and whose work rights were restricted, was also discovered by netizens. In fact, he has taken on many small business shows in recent years. However, after his articles came out and the incident rose to the "public level", Weibo was caught Guttering, being named by the official media, the chances of another business performance in the near future may be greatly reduced.

Based on the above examples, one key point can be seen.

In the past, these artists who have been banned in controversial incidents can switch to performance classes in a low-key manner, or they can quietly engage in small-scale commercial performances - without being reported by the public.

But one of the key points is that you cannot continue to be a "public figure."

Therefore, as long as it rises to the public view, such as large-scale stage performances, TV and movie appearances, etc., are restricted.

And the far-reaching cyberspace is of course also in the category of public view.

Therefore, when the matter aroused the attention of online public opinion, the official media would "state their position". Taking Song Dongye as an example, he would face public scrutiny and stronger control.

Entertainment storm | Official media mentions "Wu Moufan's crazy rice circle" Approves mainland brokerage companies to use fans to make money for entertainment storms | Star storms are more difficult to predict the development of the Chinese film industry in mainland anti-monopoly supervision | Scholars: hire Taiwanese artists Walking on thin ice, little pink speeds up the decoupling of the performing arts circles across the Taiwan Strait

Regardless of five years and ten years, the chances of inferior artists appearing on stage are slim?

Looking back on 2016, Feng Yuan, then a member of the National Committee of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference and vice chairman of the China Federation of Literary and Art Circles, suggested that there should be corresponding “more detailed” sanctions for celebrities involved in drug and pornography. Tolerate, for the first offender, consider giving him a chance to reform.

But now, whether it is the regulation of the entertainment industry or the atmosphere of public opinion in the Mainland, it is no longer the same.

In recent years, with stricter regulations and the increasing trend of reporting, it is difficult for artists who are "stained with inferiority" to appear on the Internet or in small performance venues.

Therefore, observing controversies in recent years, when celebrities issue statements or clarify rumors, they will always apologize with the phrase "I'm sorry for occupying public resources", which can also tell some clues.

Although the phrase "sorry for occupying public resources" is often ridiculed by some netizens, it can reflect the Chinese government's clear that artists must bear social responsibility when they enjoy the attention of everyone, and become a "public role model" in society.

The story of Robert Downey will be difficult to replicate in China.

And when one step is wrong, while losing the aura, he also loses the opportunity to continue to move forward in the show business circle that is under the eyes of thousands of people.

"You can switch to something else and continue to be a public figure, no," the official media's response to Song Dongye's "complaint that the ban has expired and he can't perform as usual" is also an answer to whether the banned artist can return in the future.

Series reports:

Renovation of the entertainment circle, one | Liu Xiaoqing and Fan Bingbing have different lives with others?

The new order of the entertainment circle after three waves of hot tricks

Renovate the entertainment circle.

2. Ke Zhendong's drug use is the beginning and the ban is getting stricter just because "Your circle is too messy"?

Renovate the entertainment circle.

Three | Nicholas Tse abandons foreign nationals due to restrictions on nationality?

Catch the red line of the invisible "political atmosphere"

Source: hk1

All news articles on 2021-11-21

You may like

Life/Entertain 2024-04-06T04:24:46.722Z

Trends 24h

News/Politics 2024-04-18T20:25:41.926Z

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.