Arms embargo intimidate critics of fake account of alleged Douma chemical attack

Washington-Sana

Evidence is increasing documenting the misleading practices carried out by the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons with the aim of concealing the truth about the “alleged chemical attack” in Douma in Damascus countryside in 2018, as senior officials in the organization not only concealed the findings of toxicology experts about what happened, but rather replaced them with a report They distorted the facts and launched campaigns of personal targeting against these experts, according to the independent Gray Zone news website.

Journalist Aaron Mattei confirmed in an investigation published by the site that the organization not only concealed the report of scientists who denied the use of chemical weapons in the alleged Douma attack, but also launched an investigation aimed at discrediting experts who questioned its practices and fabricated reports about the incident.

The website listed the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons' suppression of scientists as part of a series of lies and misleading practices carried out by the organization's leadership to spoil the investigations about the alleged Douma incident and fabricate reports about it to serve the organization and its operators from Western countries that support terrorists in Syria.

The website pointed out in its new investigation that the manipulation of the organization’s administration began after the issuance of a report in which the inspectors who investigated the alleged chemical incident in Duma confirmed that there was no evidence of a chemical weapons attack, and this fact undermines the allegations made by the American, British and French governments to launch their tripartite aggression against Syria in the April 14, 2018.

The website indicated that Dr. Brendan Whelan, the author of the original report, objected to the false alternative report and sent a protest to the organization's management, to start a confrontation later between the organization and scientists from the preliminary investigation team, who rejected its distortion and distortion of facts under the influence of Western countries dominant on the work of the organization.

A previous leak by an official in the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons revealed that the organization’s administration launched a malicious and flawed attack against two veteran inspectors because they proved the organization’s official account regarding the alleged Douma incident, which the countries supporting terrorists in Syria exploited to launch an accusation campaign against the Syrian Arab Army.

In the leak, this official, who is the fourth to reveal the falsity of the organization’s reports, spoke of “serious concerns about the investigation and the horror of the abhorrent mistreatment of the inspectors by the organization’s management,” warning at the same time that there is an atmosphere of intimidation to keep other employees afraid until they remain silent about the disclosure of the inaccuracy of The organization's report on the alleged attack.

The official pointed out that one of the former inspectors, Ian Henderson, a 12-year veteran of the organization, led field inspections in Douma and conducted a detailed engineering study of the gas cylinders at the scene of the accident, and concluded that the cylinders were “placed manually and did not fall from the air, as the organization’s report claimed.” Which indicates the responsibility of the terrorists in Douma for the incident at the time, stressing that the organization buried the Henderson study and issued a final report that echoes the version put forward by the US and British foreign ministries to imply that the Syrian army dropped the cylinders from the air.

Despite all these facts and leaked documents about the organization and its misleading practices, its director, Fernando Arias Gonzalez, insisted during an accountability session of the Security Council last June on presenting lies and covering up the scandal of false reports prepared by the organization about the alleged Douma attack and the distortions and distortions committed by senior officials of the organization facts for many years.

The aforementioned accountability session would not have occurred had it not been for the voices of some scientists from within the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons who exposed the falsehood of the reports prepared by the organization about the alleged Douma attack and the manipulation of the results of the investigations to be in line with the American and Western narrative in the context of the terrorist war on Syria.

Basma Kanon