The first summaries of the day of Nir Hefetz's testimony were on Net 2 at 12 or so, submitted by Dov Gil-Har.
According to Hefetz's testimony, Prime Minister Netanyahu was entirely focused on the style of control freak on the issue of the media.
Dov Gil-Har and Hefetz himself are the explanation.
Gil-Har, a professional and eloquent media man, with an eternal status, began his career as a soldier in the IDF waves, where he worked for years. The ruler even before the rumor passed that there was such a thing.
In the language of Berl Katzenelson, Gali Tzahal is the combination that emits more talented and less talented media people like straw packages to the Israeli media world.
This is uniform thinking.
It is not right and left as we once thought;
This is a group of polytrucks, who when the interests of the establishment or of the ruling class are in danger, they will stand up for the defense of the fortress from which they make a living.
Gil-Har expressed disgust with Netanyahu, since Netanyahu shredded the papers on which the antitrust commissioner's decision regarding Yes and Bezeq was printed.
The content is on the Internet, but Network B has made it a dark criminal drama.
State witness Nir Hefetz at the entrance to the courtroom, Photo: Oren Ben Hakon
In the minutes when I listened to the reports in the diary, there was no mention of the most important point in Hefetz's testimony yesterday - that is, that section 83 of the indictment concerning Shlomo Pilber is incorrect. Hefetz testified that Netanyahu did not instruct him to contact Pilber on Elovich and Bezeq issues to make sure that he continues to act in Elovich's favor. This is a complete rebuttal of a key clause in the 4000 case.
So there is a good reason why Netanyahu focused on many years of trying to change the media map in the country;
This is a strategic matter.
Hefetz said one sentence, very significant, without meaning to: Netanyahu was more concerned with the media than with security.
The reality right now in the country proves that Netanyahu was right, even if he failed.
The media has trained the "Brotherhood" with the Muslim Brotherhood.
A kind of distorted mirror image of the malignant coalition that today makes up the Democratic Party.
As a result of the demonstrated weakness, the disturbances of May-June this year never ceased - but remained as an intifada over a small fire.
Israel is playing today for its existence, for the lives of its citizens - protection only.
If you happen to be at the scene when a terrorist fires, you can respond with live fire.
Direct direction to the owner
In order to evaluate the testimony of an object, one must first remember that it is testimony obtained under extortion by threats. The investigation was conducted in illegal ways and the person responsible for this is Spokesman Mandelblit and State Attorney Shai Nitzan at the time.
Contacts at the decisive political level have in the past determined the fate of the media and newspapers - so there are existential motives here.
For example, in the days of Sharon, a radio station, Channel 7, was closed. The disgraceful act, with legal and academic backing, was done in preparation for the disengagement.
Makor Rishon was in danger of closing and was dependent on the decision of the Antitrust Commissioner.
Yedioth Ahronoth itself, with a huge monopoly, faced a danger of legislation in 2002 and its publisher knew how to stir in the Knesset and threaten. The legislation intended to harm "Israel Today".
The State Attorney's Office came out to defend the media complex in Israel, when Shai Nitzan decided to file an indictment dealing with positive media coverage for the first time in the history of the bribe.
Why?
There should always be a "first time," he argued.
As if it was the night of the wedding and not the night of the living dead.
