The investor will probably have to reschedule again for the extensive redevelopment of the “lid” area on the Öferl.
Weilheim's city council surprisingly postponed the final approval and the initiation of the development plan process - because there was still a "need for speech", as it was said.
Weilheim
- In the construction committee of the Weilheim city council, things went according to plan for the investor 14 days ago: The majority had approved the latest draft plan of the "Immobilien Zentrum Oberbayern" for the redevelopment of the former "Deckel" company premises. Accordingly, three larger complexes with two to five floors and up to 18.50 meters in height are planned at the corner of Hangstraße and Am Öferl. We are talking about a total of around 80 new apartments.
For one important detail, however, BfW spokeswoman Brigitte Holeczek had already restricted her “yes” in the building committee meeting: If neighbors should speak out against the investor's project, the five-story high point will now - unlike previously thought - be on the south side instead of the one If you place the north side of the hillside road, they will also reject this change.
And there have been exactly such complaints in the meantime, said Holeczek in the city council last Thursday.
Therefore she applied to "relocate this high point" - to the north side, as it was originally intended.
The opinion of the building committee was canceled again
With this in mind, the city council unanimously repealed the building committee's report. The decision on the final approval of the investor's planning and the initiation of the land-use planning was also postponed unanimously. "There is still a need to speak, there are simply more discussions to be had," said 2nd Mayor Angelika Flock (CSU) as chairperson of the meeting, summarizing the numerous requests to speak: "This is about a large area, so you want to do everything right. "
From an urban planning point of view, it “doesn't matter which side the five-storey building is on” - Manfred Stork, the head of the municipal building administration, had previously emphasized this. The background to the new entry on the part of the investor are specifications of the Free State: In order to receive loans and grants, all subsidized housing units (i.e. the 30 percent of the new apartments that are "socially bound" according to the SoBoN regulation of the city) must be centrally located in the same Stork explained: That is why the investor wanted to house them bundled on the northern part of the property, including the required commercial share of at least ten percent. The complex in the south - where the builder would also like to have the high point - should, on the other hand, only contain apartments for free sale.
"May not let us put the knife on our chests"
But the city council did not want to follow this line of argument.
One is “not there to meet the investor's business conduct,” explained Holeczek.
Your BfW colleague Claus Reindl added that after the early public participation it was owed to the residents not to “deviate” from the plan presented there.
The city should not let the investor "put the knife on its chest," said Horst Martin (SPD).
And Brigitte Gronau (Greens) warned of a "light, ventilation and heat barrier", which in her opinion means the five-story high point on the south side.
Even for Stefan Zirngibl (CSU) it would “not be right to take a different decision on the high point than it was presented to the citizens”: “This cannot be expected of the residents - regardless of the investor's usage or funding concept looks like. ”But a fundamental reduction in the planned development would no longer be possible, emphasized Zirngibl and recalled that the client had already reduced the original dimensions after the residents' meetings.
The value-added model is not yet in sight
Green spokesman Manuel Neulinger again referred to a fundamental problem of his parliamentary group with the planned redevelopment: In view of the considerable follow-up costs that the city will have to face, for example in terms of day-care centers and schools, a value-added model must be developed before the development plan is drawn up.
But that would "take some time," replied Stork, head of the building administration;
the city is currently having an expert opinion drawn up for this.
Even if the city council postponed the introduction of the land-use planning "Hangstrasse / Am Öferl" for the time being and arranged new discussions with the investor regarding the "high point": The fundamental decision has been made, and the procedure will probably begin well before a model for the depreciation of value is adopted.
