A report by the Reut Institute analyzes the alliance between the progressive left and the Muslim Brotherhood, and clarifies why Hamas is the biggest beneficiary of the political climate in Israel.
The past week has provided at least one significant insight into the change of government in Israel. The Bennett-Lapid government arose and corresponded with the progressive revolution in the United States, forging an alliance with the Islamic movements. For the first time, a research body from an institution, the Reut Institute, thoroughly analyzes the phenomenon. On a small fire, "led by Israeli Arabs led by Hamas. For many years, there has been talk of the Red-Green Alliance in Europe. Now, a Reut report states, the phenomenon has migrated to America and there it is reaping frightening success.
"An analysis of this phenomenon provides a basis for understanding the drastic change in American policy in the Middle East ... the slowdown in the momentum of the normalization of the Abrahamic Accords, and the American laxity of Iran; And his partners in compiling the report, Adi Levy and Abed Asala.
While the defense establishment has designated some human rights organizations as terrorist organizations because of its connection to the Popular Front, the Muslim Brotherhood is actually a partner in the Israeli government. The Likud and the entire right, which are the majority of the Israeli public, have not yet been declared terrorist organizations, but a campaign is underway to totally delegitimize and erase the opposition. The Netanyahu trial, which is being conducted with great media noise, and Gideon Saar's law limiting the prime minister's term are intended to burn a new concept - "Netanyahu's trauma" - as defined by Haim Ramon. Before our eyes is a move that is not an ordinary change of government through elections, but a "regime change."
"The fundamental change (in the United States, in the Democratic Party) is largely the result of deepening a socio-political alliance between radical progressive bodies and bodies affiliated with political Islam, and especially organizations affiliated with the ideology of the Muslim Brotherhood," the Reut report said.
Accompanying anti-Semitism and anti-Israelism, which have already been exposed in the struggles for security assistance, are a derivative of the current takeover led by Bernie Sanders, Alexandria Oxio Cortez, Ilhan Omar and Rashida Talib. "The strategy and level of organization of organizations affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood in the United States make it possible to influence U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East and especially to advance an anti-Israel agenda."
It turns out that Muslim organizations focus their activities in Washington using support frameworks provided by Qatar and Turkey. According to the researchers, these organizations do not represent the majority of the Muslim public in America. Therefore, they focus their penetration on centers of influence such as research institutes, radical left-wing political organizations, and integration into some sections of a "progressive" social struggle unrelated to Islamism or anti-Israel interests.
Anyone who has followed the dynamics in the Democratic Party in recent years, and especially since Joe Biden came to power, could have noticed that their enemy in the Middle East is the same Sunni regimes as in Egypt, Saudi Arabia and the Gulf principalities. These are actually the pro-Western countries with which Israel is working together against Iran. The American struggle against those countries precedes the struggle in Iran. "The danger to Israel from the nuclear project does not 'interest' the Red-Green Alliance. There is equally a deliberate denial or deliberate disregard for the threat posed to Israel by the deployment of proxy forces in the region and the creation of a kinetic 'fire circle' directed against Israel."
These currents are dominant in the Democratic Party, "Hamas actually support Fro-aktibit ... This support is a direct result of the Progressive Alliance with the Muslim Brotherhood and radical leftist Palestinians," the report said.
It is doubtful whether raising the UK and some other countries, the Declaration on HAMAS Terrorism - what's new? - can make up for the US administration's support for Hamas.
Excess cargo named Israel
Maintaining bipartisan relations with America is important, but do not enter into the illusions of "ripping the rift"
when monitoring the activities of the Israeli government, it seems to be trying to create reciprocity and correspond with the Democratic regime.
And first of all Iran.
When Prime Minister Naftali Bennett says "no," what does he mean?
Former Prime Minister Netanyahu's opposition actions in the political and operational spheres against Iran have been met with outrage and harsh criticism from coalition partners and Bennett himself. Israel has promised not to publicly fight the nuclear deal and not to "surprise" operationally.
Beyond that, as we have seen in the wake of the assassination of Eliyahu Kay in the Old City of Jerusalem, near the Chain Gate, and earlier the killing of Bar-El Shmueli in Gaza, Israel is playing only defense against terrorism, against Hamas.
The apparent calm around the Gaza Strip stems from the desire of Hamas and the RAM to establish the new normalcy, after Israel took over forces that support a "state of all its citizens" and fear a clash with a democratic government in Washington.
Bennett's well-publicized campaign for the Glasgow climate conference, along with problematic destinations in the field of carbon emissions from various fuels, including natural gas, also sent a message to Americans that Israel is internalizing the new mask of values.
Foreign Minister Lapid's attack on the Vyshigrad countries, as well as the complete blurring of the definition of anti-Semitism and its adaptation to American identity politics, constitutes an ideological conscious retreat in order to integrate into an internal American process that Israel should stay away from.
Since the new government was formed, there has been talk of a "return" to a policy of bipartisan support for American politics. There is denial among Yair Lapid, the security establishment, Naftali Bennett and others about the in-depth processes that have changed the Democratic Party from within. It's a long-term change, but it's been gaining momentum since the rise of Barack Obama in 2008.
Dialogue and keeping in touch are important things. The proposed strategy for "reconciliation" - both with the liberal Jews and with the Democratic Party - is an illusion. It is based on the traditional notion that if only the American left is liked, then they will finally understand. Organizations like J-Street are the expression of this development. The principle is to remove the excess baggage called "Israel" from the bent Jewish back. Some of the Jewish elite prefer to pay in Israeli currency so that the antisemitic radical tsunami does not drown it.
In fact, the anti-Israel processes in the Democratic Party were exposed as early as the late 1970s, during the days of President Carter. But then there was still a muscular Jewish community in America, and a significant influence in the Democratic Party, and so leaders like Moshe Dayan and Menachem Begin could openly confront and even threaten the American president.
From the 1980s onwards, Benjamin Netanyahu led the process of building support within the Republican Party and in general among the religious conservative public in the United States. Afraid to join the enemies of Israel.
Horror budget.
Biden // Photo: Reuters,
The Prayer Book of the Times
According to the progressives, there are acts of killing, robbery, vandalism and punishment without trial, which are justified by the very ethnic or racial identity of the perpetrator
.
The damage to the US international status following the failure to withdraw from Afghanistan does not really bother the Democrats. Perhaps only in the electoral aspect, because they still do not yet have a sweeping answer to the election problem and the opposition in the American public to their path.
But the so-called "progressive" faction, and in fact a faction of tyranny and totalitarianism, is leading the Democrats to war against America.
This is how Prof. Philip Karl Salzman, an anthropologist at McGill University, defines it, in a recent article (PJmedia.) The
revolution has a different logic than the reform.
The very concepts they use of "change" and "transformation" cover revolutionary moves.
The response to the acquittal of that boy, Kyle Rittenhouse, who is accused of murdering two protesters a year ago in Wisconsin, shows the depth of "change" that this revolution is infiltrating American society.
According to the left-wing progressives, there are acts of killing, robbery, vandalism and punishment without trial, which are justified by the very ethnic or racial identity of the perpetrator.
Killing out of self-defense is no longer considered.
The "justice" of the masses precedes the law and the court.
Justice is no longer done in court but on the street, by the mob, whether in squares, campuses or the Twitter space.
The $ 3.5 trillion terror budget that Biden is trying to pass will lead to the bankruptcy of the United States. Only those who fight against American society are willing to flood the market with printed money without covering goods, products. The border. The
Jews see this reality. The whirlpool threatens them. They recognize that those who support Israel are the Republicans. They are witnesses that the Democrats are pushing American society into civil war. And whoever tears them to shreds are these Democrats.
Still, they are still on the train of the Democratic Party.
A fundamental theological disconnect is emerging between the revolutionary morality of the Democrats, drawn from Lenin's seminary and classical European anti-Semitism, and the basic values and morals of the Jews, who were accused of inventing the conscience.
The same abnormal organ that is also a kind of excess charge for those who want to bring about "regime change."
This is what underlies the denial of the State of Israel and its support for anti-Western Islamist forces.
So why does American Jewry, for the most part, more than 70 percent, support Democrats?
Because above all the destructive processes, which led to even overt pogroms at noon against Jews and their property in May-June this year, the logo hangs: the Democratic Party.
Because it's written in the New York Times Prayer Book.
The Jews are unable to tolerate the Republicans;
They brainwashed them against Trump.
Jewish left-wing organizations are showing them videos showing the demolition of a house in the heart of nowhere.
So they erase Israel from the equation - blaming Israel for their plight instead of those who attack them and push them out of public space.
But above all, they cling to Democrats as if that's their last name.
It's their American identity channel for a hundred years or more.
The blindness on the Israeli side stems from an automatic response to the words "Americans" and "the United States". The governmental and security institutions in Israel do not think in terms of "radical left and Islamists"; The US administration. The effects of the administration in Israel are negative. The same instability that it creates in the United States, it exports into Israel and the Middle East as a whole.
Who made the mistake?
Bennett Vidlin forgot who served in the White House in 2015, and what has happened since then to the Iran nuclear program
"The mistake we made after the first nuclear deal in 2015 will not come back," Bennett said this week in a lecture at the IDC. The Obama administration served to prevent military action inside Iran, radiated weakness in Syria, and leaked Israeli operations in the region.
A minister who served in Netanyahu's government says: "Bennett's words are misleading the public. Netanyahu did huge things against Iran. Both the sanctions imposed by Obama and the severe sanctions imposed by Trump are thanks to him. "The last two years of the political crisis have damaged readiness to some extent."
Who was interested in the crippling political crisis?
Amos Yadlin expressed himself in a similar way to Bennett.
He said the opposite: that the 2015 nuclear deal was great for Iran, but it was a mistake to get out of it.
In 2007, when Yadlin was head of the Armed Forces, the intelligence assessment was: "Assuming no difficulties are piled up on Iran, then the dire scenario is that by the end of 2009 Iran could have nuclear weapons." What has happened in the 12 years since they have not had a bomb?
Were we wrong?
Fixed!
If you find an error in the article, we will be happy for you to share it with us and we will correct it
