Olga Kravchenko, known as AK from the murder of the late Tair Rada, filed a defamation lawsuit and copyright infringement in the Tel Aviv District Court in the amount of NIS 5.4 million, against Adv. Yarom Halevi, Roman Zadorov's defense attorney, and creators of the series The docu-"Shadow of Truth" Ari Pines, Yotam Gandelman and the production company "Bitza'in Productions".
According to the lawsuit, which was filed by Adv. Amir Titonowitz, beginning in 2016, the plaintiff is, involuntarily and not in her favor, "under the barrage of libelous publications, probably the most serious, hurled in Israel, ever, certainly at a private person- Anonymous, a journey that has not yet ended. "
Zadorov trial continues: The investigator who led the reconstruction of the murder and a school psychologist testify (archive) // Photo: David Cohen-Ginitsilom:
The extreme and exceptional severity of this barrage stems both from the severity of the content of the publications - the plaintiff is presented in them as a serial and sadistic killer, both in their enormous quantity and duration - over five years,
The lawsuit states that Adv. Yarom Halevi, who is one of the most well-known lawyers in Israel and that "many laymen" see him as bright and innocent, has for several years represented Roman Zadorov, who in 2010 was convicted of the murder of the late girl Tair Rada in 2006. Such and other appeals, taken on his behalf, were dismissed by the Supreme Court and recently the Supreme Court ordered its conduct against a retrial and this has already begun.
Yarom Halevi, Roman Zadorov's lawyer, Photo: Oren Ben Hakon
Roman Zdorov, Tair Rada, Photo: David Cohen / Ginny
"Adv. Yarom Halevi, apparently, was not satisfied with legal representation, and he appointed himself a public relations man, a media man, a forensic scientist, a researcher, a judge (to his understanding, honest - and for a change, not 'corrupt', as he claims They are the judges, who sat on the Zadorov case, who allegedly did a 'false trial') and executed. "A public field trial led to her public conviction, and she hoped to bring her public condemnation and stoning," the lawsuit said.
"Along with these, the defendants, each in his own way, acted with great negligence towards the plaintiff, led to the disclosure of her identity to the public, and led the public to believe that she was the murderer of the deceased girl. Pines and Gandelman and the production company To the plaintiff, in seven paintings, the fruit of a brush, which were presented as part of the convicting chapter, without her permission, without calling them by name, and in the manner from which it emerges, as if the plaintiff were the killer. As described by Pines and Yotam (and sometimes Mika) Legal commentators, investigators, judges and executioners. "
It is important to note that when Zadorov, through Adv. Halevi, filed a motion that Kravchenko testify before the retrial proceedings begin, and a motion was also filed to ban her from leaving the country, both motions were denied by Judge Asher Kola.
The judge noted, among other things, that "with all due respect, Ola is not accused, there is no reason to harm her freedom and her relationship with her family members in Ukraine. Moreover, Ola has proved by her actions and behavior so far "We did not flee the country and even when she was abroad, she returned to Israel, and as detailed, she even intends to present an exhibition in Israel during the month of October."
Were we wrong?
Fixed!
If you found an error in the article, we'll be happy for you to share it with us
