The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Gilles-William Goldnadel: "Which side is intolerant fascism on?"

2021-12-06T10:16:50.469Z


FIGAROVOX / CHRONIQUE - During his trip to Marseille and Villepinte during his meeting, Eric Zemmour was the target of antifas. Lawyer Gilles-William Goldnadel is surprised that the left, usually so quick to denounce attacks on freedom, remains silent in the face of this violence.


Gilles-William Goldnadel is a lawyer and essayist.

Each week, he deciphers the news for FigaroVox.

This month, he is publishing a

Manual of Resistance to Far-Left Fascism

(Nouvelles éditions de Passy).

Throughout the year that is taking leave, I have told my reader about my political anxieties and my democratic concerns.

I shared with him, as a good friend, my anxiety-inducing obsessions.

History not to keep everything to myself.

I told him that not only Islamo-leftism existed, but that I met him every day at the corner of the media street.

I told him that American Wokism had landed on the banks of the Seine.

I told him that the white suffering was systematically concealed.

I told him that, contrary to the soothing rhetoric, enforced mass immigration continued to thrive.

Which political party, which media organ has protested against the special and anti-democratic treatment which the candidate Zemmour is specially subjected to?

Gilles-William Goldnadel

I told him that French public service broadcasting was still allergic to pluralism. I told him that the war of the sexes was declared in the media tribunal and that the white heterosexual male was in legal danger. I told her that the obsession with gender was a dangerous disease for our children and that, more generally, our society gone mad should now be looked at from a psychiatric angle. I told him that the compelling moral injunctions to which we were subjected - such as inclusive writing - tended to want to lock us in a permanent re-education camp guarded by destructuring lunatics. And as for his guardians, they are not very benevolent.

I told him that a political Europe which wants to impose on us values ​​that we did not want is in fact devoid of them.

Finally, I told her that the spirit of censorship and the use of urban violence characterizing the hard-pressed extreme left had taken on a fascist character, in the misguided sense used by it for ages to silence its opponents.

But my ridiculous warnings have remained largely dead letters beyond a square of intellectual and media resistance fighters.


The past week is the passive witness.

To read also Gilles-William Goldnadel: "Is it really the extreme right which threatens the freedom of expression?"

When the European Commissioner for Equality, the Maltese Helena Dalli, wanted to ban a list of terms, including "Christmas" "Marie" and "ladies and gentlemen", in the name of sacred diversity, which public television channel, which major newspaper, with the exception of Stéphane Kovacs and Anne Rovan in Le Figaro of December 1, devoted a critical report to this attempt to annul by decree the Christian dimension of Europe? Already, in November, a Council of Europe campaign ecstatically celebrated “Freedom in the hijab”.

What a political personality, with the exception of Eric Ciotti, what media protested when last Wednesday, at the UN, France, against the Eastern European nations, the United States and Great Britain, voted on a revisionist resolution denying any link between the Temple Mount (Esplanade des Mosques), Judaism and Christianity?

This resolution decrees that this disputed holy place is exclusively Islamic and will henceforth only be named under its Arabic name: Haram el-Sharif… This vote takes place on this feast of Hanukkah which celebrates the re-inauguration of the Temple after the Jewish victory over the Syro-Greek armies in the year 165 before the birth of this Jesus who went to this same temple to pray ... seven hundred years before the birth of Islam ... As the American delegate declared: "

the omission of the connection of Jews and Christians to the Temple Mount is a very serious problem.

The terminology adopted is morally, historically and politically wrong

”.

In reality the extreme left does not exist in the media which only extremises the right side.

Gilles-William Goldnadel

But under the cretinous revision of the history of men and religions, under the savage uprooting of Judeo-Christian roots, the Submission is hiding.

Latest example to date: which political party, which media organ has protested against the special and antidemocratic treatment of which the candidate Éric Zemmour is specially the subject? I am a little ashamed to have to write: "Whatever else, the look that one carries to the latter ”as it is not very heroic to defend the right of speech of the personalities with the speech agreed, suitable and consensual. Who, for example, protested against the lexical manipulation that we are witnessing, silent? Thus it is that this one is mediatically and systematically called “extreme right polemicist” while I challenge anyone to find the label of “extreme left” on the costume of Mélenchon, faithful disciple of Castro. Perhaps, rarely, kindly one: "left of the left".

In reality the extreme left does not exist in the media which only extremises the right side.



What man on the left protested against the violence of the extreme left “antifas” in Marseille as well as in Villepinte: “To silence him”?

They didn't say anything.

Ah if I forgot: some, like the always refined Alice Coffin, have expressed their understanding if not their approval.

As part of a "democratic harassment" of which the totalitarian and arbitrary left has the perverse secret.

To read also Gilles-William Goldnadel: "We are at war both outside and inside our borders"

Who, within this left in love with freedom, protested against this freedom-killing demand for the cancellation of the Villepinte meeting demanded by Stéphane Troussel, socialist departmental president of Seine St Denis, and by the always very tolerant Clémentine Autain, member extremely left of France Insoumise?

They didn't say anything.

Even stronger - or crazier - now the antifas and their allies of SOS Racism take the victim pose, on the evening of a meeting in Villepinte that they wanted to disturb.

For their part, unconscious Chattemites, certain centrists send back to back the aggressors and the assaulted… or remain silent.

Meanwhile, Mr. Mélenchon, an emulator of Maduro and Chavez, organized his meeting at La Défense on the same Sunday in perfect and legitimate tranquility.

Not the slightest disturbance, no right-wing infringement of freedom of expression and assembly.

Geographic question: which side of the political street does intolerant fascism live on?

… When they came for the Catholics,


I did not protest.


I was not a Catholic.


Then they came to get me.


And there was no one left to protest


Pastor Martin Niemoller.

("I said nothing", 1942).

Source: lefigaro

All news articles on 2021-12-06

You may like

Trends 24h

News/Politics 2024-04-18T11:17:37.535Z
News/Politics 2024-04-18T20:25:41.926Z

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.