The doll, and the blood splatter in the bathroom: Zadorov's retrial resumed

In the cross-examination of the arena expert, Zadorov's lawyer presented pictures from the murder scene of Tair Rada at home as well as the fish on a doll he had brought with him.

This is in an attempt to challenge the position of the prosecution experts and the reconstruction of the murder, according to which the killer was on the verge of the cell whose door was open

Eli Ashkenazi

07/12/2021

Tuesday, 07 December 2021, 11:47 Updated: 12:26

• Share on Facebook

• Share on WhatsApp

• Share on Twitter

• Share on Email

• Share on general

• Comments

  Comments

In the video: Judges and Zadorov arrived at the murder scene of Tair Rada at the school in Katzrin, where a demonstration was held in the bathroom (Photo: Eli Ashkenazi)

Roman Zadorov's retrial continued today (Tuesday) in the Nazareth District Court with the cross - examination of defense attorney Yarom Halevi.

In the testimony of the day, Halevy presented to the interrogated arena expert,

Major General

Shmuel Piamenta, pictures from the scene of the murder of the girl Tair Rada at a school in Katzrin in 2006, as well as the fish on a doll he brought with him.

trying to undermine the position of the prosecution's experts and the reconstruction of the murder, which the killer was standing on the edge of the cell where the door was open.

Halevi showed a picture with the inscription inside the door almost entirely free of bloodstains. This is part of the bar is hidden when the door is closed. nearby, the wall and the door had splashes However, it should be remembered that at one point the door was closed by the killer who entered the cell.

More on Walla!

The makeup collection that will close a glamorous look - both for the evening and for everyday

In collaboration with Bobby Brown

More on Walla!

• Handprint or footprint?

  At the Zadorov trial, we discussed the unidentified bloodstain found at the scene of the murder of Tair Rada

Adv. Halevi and the doll in court, today (Photo: Eli Ashkenazi)

In his main testimony, Piamenta said there was an exact correlation between the reconstruction and the findings, and that one of the unidentified blood marks found at the scene seemed to him more like a handprint rather than a footprint.

This is in contrast to the defense's thesis that the unidentified blood mark may be the footprint of another killer's shoe.

Corporal Piamenta, today (Photo: Eli Ashkenazi)

The head of the tribunal, Judge Cola, noted that it was possible for two people to be inside the toilet cubicle when it was closed.

Piamenta in his testimony said that when two people are standing inside the cell the dynamics that are created cannot leave such blood splashes.

He added that the diameter of the splashes in the cell and their characterization could not have been formed when the killer and the murdered were together inside the cell.

Tair Rada (Photo: Ginny)

Next, the judges asked to know how the killer did not leave a trace of blood outside the toilet cubicle where the murder took place.

Witness Piamenta says most of the blood flowed from the murdered woman's body not immediately in the first moments.

The massive amount of blood was cleared later.

The shoes did not remain soaked in blood.

• news

• News in Israel

• Criminal news and law

Tags

• Tair Rada

• Roman Zdorov