Zhao Jiaxian was bitten and thrown ears case report reveals that the defendant Zeng knifed his wife by the neck, the official once considered dissolving the jury

The then district councilor, Zhao Jiaxian, was bitten by an unemployed man Chen Zhen in the case of part of his left ear. The defendant did not dispute that he had injured the victim in the case. The main dispute in the case was that the defendant stated that his brain was blank at the time of the case and had no intention of seriously hurting people.

The trial had been going on smoothly, but an episode also occurred in the middle.

Before the defense summoned its psychiatric expert to testify, the judge had questioned what was unfavorable to the defendant in the report, including the mention of previous violent tendencies and the use of a knife on his wife’s neck.

The judge confessed that he was concerned about the defense's performance, worried about whether the defendant would receive a fair trial, and asked whether the jury should be dissolved.

However, the jury was not dissolved in the case, and the defense group joined a Senior Counsel.

The defense report alleged that the defendant had put a knife on his wife's neck

The case had been progressing well, but before the defense called its psychiatric expert Huang Yiqian, the judge questioned it on the 24th of last month and asked whether the jury should be dissolved.

The judge explained that the defense’s expert report mentioned content that was unfavorable to the defendant Chen Zhen (51 years old). For example, the defense version stated that the defendant had not always had a tendency to violence, but the report stated that the defendant had a tendency to violence before and had put a knife on his wife. neck.

The judge questioned that even the prosecution did not use relevant information, and the defense's expert report mentioned the matter instead.

In addition, the report uses anecdotal evidence in the law and believes that relevant parts need to be deleted.

The incident and the confession of the main witness.

(See the picture below for details)

+16

Concerned about the defense's performance and considered disbanding the jury

The judge confessed that he was concerned about the performance of the defense, worried about whether the defendant would receive a fair trial, and asked the defense team to consider the above situation and decide whether to dissolve the jury, change the lawyer, or join a new lawyer to assist.

However, the judge said on the morning of the next day (25th) that the jury did not need to be dissolved, and the defense lawyer team joined Senior Counsel Lu Yixin to assist Zheng Congzhan, the barrister who represented the defendant in the trial.

Lu Yixin's joining case was postponed

The trial was postponed for a few days in response to Lu Yixin's admission, and the trial resumed on the 29th of the same month.

Psychiatric expert Huang Yiqian stated in the report that he believed that the defendant Chen Zhen was affected by the mental illness of "alcohol intoxication" at the time of the case.

However, when he was cross-examined by the prosecution, he admitted that "alcoholic intoxication" had to meet four conditions, but the circumstances of the defendant at the time of the case did not meet some of the conditions.

Huang later renamed that the defendant suffered from "acute insanity caused by alcohol" and did not evade other people's attacks at the time of the case. This is in line with most of the symptoms of the disease.

The defense once claimed that the defendant was insane at the time of the case

Both the prosecution and the defense completed the proof and dealt with legal disputes without a jury.

The defense has suggested that the defendant was insane at the time of the case, or that the defendant’s behavior at the time of the case was unconscious, for consideration by the jury.

Afterwards, the defense agreed that it would not be necessary to let the jury consider the "mental disorder."

After hearing the submissions, the judge also decided that the jury should not be allowed to consider "unconscious behavior."

The judge led the jury yesterday and mentioned that even if the jury accepts that the defendant is affected by "acute insanity caused by alcohol," he chooses to drink alcohol himself and cannot justify being affected by mental illness or unconscious behavior as a defense.

The male victim in the case of Zhao Jiaxian being bitten and throwing his ears frankly did not forgive the defendant for accusing him of apology as a defense. The male passerby bit Zhao’s ear until he took it off. Zhao Jiaxian was bitten and flung his ear case. The male passerby heard that someone called Taiwan’s Jueqi should be attacked. Zhao Jiaxian was bitten and threw his left ear. Can you forgive the officer for stopping Zhao Jiaxian from being bitten and throwing his left ear | Zhao Zhi, the defendant said before the attack: I saw you and was spit out after I recognized you. Zhao Jiaxian was bitten and shook his ear. I can’t afford Zhao Jiaxian’s bite and ears. The defendant claimed that he could not represent the assailant in the film. He asked "him" about the case of Zhao Jiaxian being bitten and threw his ears. Case | The defense claims that the defendant was affected by drunkenness and admitted that he did not meet all the conditions of the disease

01News