In Iran, 75 deputies - a quarter of parliamentarians - recently signed a text entitled "
Support for the rights of the population in the face of harmful and dangerous animals
" in which they argue that living with domestic animals represents a "
destructive social problem
".
This phenomenon, they warn, could "
gradually change the Iranian and Islamic way of life
" by "
replacing human and family relationships with emotional relationships with animals
."
Read alsoIran: President Raïssi promises to put the economy back on track
The bill intends to prohibit in particular "the
raising, buying or selling, transporting, walking in a vehicle or on foot and keeping at home wild, exotic, harmful and dangerous animals
".
Appear on the list "
crocodiles, turtles, snakes, lizards, cats, mice, rabbits, dogs and other unclean animals (according to the Muslim religion) as well as monkeys
".
In Muslim law, both the dog and the pig are considered unclean.
Any offender would risk a fine equivalent to 10 to 30 times the "
minimum monthly worker salary
" (87 euros), in addition to the "
confiscation
" of the animal.
Anger and mockery
But the proposed law sparked criticism in the press, mockery on social networks and anger among residents of Tehran.
"
This project will cause chaos, corruption and collective disobedience because (...) living with animals is today a cultural phenomenon
", warns the reformist daily Shargh.
More and more Iranians from the middle and upper classes own pets, and many of them walk their dogs at night in the parks and streets of the upscale neighborhoods of the capital.
Beyond anger, some Internet users have recourse to humor.
"
How many times have cats tried to eat you?"
", Ironically on Twitter a journalist, Yeganeh Khodami.
"
I renamed my cat 'killer' since I heard this bill,
" wrote another, posting the photo of his kitten.
An actress, involved in the animal cause but who asks to remain anonymous, confides to have given up, because of the pressures, to organize a demonstration in front of the Parliament.
Read alsoHow the animal cause is invited in the race for the Élysée
Faced with this outcry, few parliamentarians openly defend the text. "
I agree with the project in general, but disagree with certain clauses,
" explains the head of the judicial commission in Parliament Moussa Ghazanfarabadi, who signed the text. “
It's just a bill. Whether it succeeds is another matter,
”he said.
An ecologist deputy from Tehran, Somayeh Rifieï, thinks that a law is needed.
"
No one can deny the services animals provide to humans, but this area must be regulated,
" she said.
She nevertheless considers that she prefers to put on the agenda a government bill which, for its part, "
pays particular attention to biodiversity and wildlife
" and "
deals with both animal and human rights
" .
And to deplore the fact that the bill “
focuses only on criminalization
”.