Opinion | Introduction to Disrupting Legal Proceedings and Hindus Consciousness Israel today

State witness Nir Hefetz returned to the witness stand.

This time he answered questions from Advocate Jacques Chen, Mr. Elovich's defense attorney. Hefetz admitted that "the entire investigation tried to erase something that was not there.

There was no memory at any stage regarding the meeting between Elovich and Netanyahu.

This whole investigation was very confusing.

I did not understand what was wanted of me. "

These are just some of the descriptions, just before Adv. Chen completes his cross-examination and hands the baton to Adv. Michal Ozer-Rosen, Ms. Iris Elowitz's attorney.

These statements cannot be left in the air without reference to substance;

The witness claims that the law enforcement agencies are planting a memory in a criminal case that deals with the law of souls, which he did not have.

They ostensibly make him say things he does not believe in, does not know how to be precise, and thus they lead him to testify falsely in court.

The second day of Hefetz's cross-examination by defense attorney Elowitz // Photo: Yoni Rickner

If Hefetz's claim is true, then Hefetz has exposed us to authorities without balances and brakes, authorities that prosecute people for disrupting court proceedings while disrupting the trial themselves, planting evidence in a witness 'mouth, misleading the court, causing a witness to give false testimony and impairing judges' ability to do Justice Trial.

Disruption of legal proceedings is a serious offense.

The then President of the Supreme Court, the late Justice Menachem Alon, ruled that the seriousness of this offense amounts to a ground for detention until the end of the proceedings.

During today's testimony, Hefetz added that the document, which was torn down by Netanyahu and received exceptional coverage by the media, was a routine action by Netanyahu.

"He says everything," Hefetz said, "even the grocery list, speeches he writes in handwriting, everything - he is a conscious person."

The judges, unlike the media, did not remain indifferent to this statement, and on the part of Judge Friedman-Feldman, the head of the panel, and Judge Bar-Am, remarks were made that indicated their displeasure with the conduct.

Judge Bar-Am added: "We know what the term grinding means. Why did you not say that in the main investigation?"

To sum up this day, Hefetz has proved that his statements serve certain media, Hefetz may be aware that a sentence he says will grab headlines to engineer consciousness, and when he comes back from the spin, there will be those who think we live in a parallel world.

Were we wrong?

Fixed!

If you found an error in the article, we'll be happy for you to share it with us