The expert who will determine whether Zadorov stepped on Tair Rada's body testifies: "The same case was filed."
Shoe imprint expert Yaron Schur is now testifying in Roman Zadorov's retrial.
In his testimony the first trial stated that Schur had a degree of "very high probability" match between Zadorov's shoes and the marks found on Tair's pants
Eli Ashkenazi
21/12/2021
Tuesday, December 21, 2021, 9:30 p.m.
Share on Facebook
Share on WhatsApp
Share on Twitter
Share on Email
Share on general
Comments
Comments
As part of the retrial of Roman Zadorov, who is accused of murdering Tair Rada, the testimony of retired Superintendent Yaron Shur will be heard today (Tuesday).
Schur, who has served 32 years in police forensics labs, is an expert witness in the field of shoe imprint marks.
"The same case," Schur said today before testifying.
Schur was one of the key witnesses in Zadorov's first trial and in his testimony showed that signs were found on Rada's trousers indicating six remnants of the footprints that Zadorov wore on the day of the murder.
Schur found that there is a degree of fit of "very high probability," which means, according to the explanation he gave, that the chance of him locking her way otherwise on the rest pants is purely theoretical.
More on Walla!
Shai Mika Yifrach waited for Tair Rada by the fountain.
She had not imagined that the worst of all could happen
To the full article
More on Walla!
"Default": Zdorov's knife and bag did not pass a DNA test and were not stored properly
The arena expert in the Zadorov trial: there is no perfect match between the reconstruction of the murder and the findings in the arena
15 years since the murder of Tair Rada: Roman Zadorov and the judges arrived at the school in Katzrin
Feel like armchair sweet potatoes and want to make a change?
This swimming method is the best way
"The same case," Yarin Schur, an expert witness in the field of shoe prints (Photo: Walla !, Eli Ashkenazi)
Zdorov, also according to his testimony, wore shoes on the day of the murder produced by a company called "Salamander" who brought them with him from Ukraine.
This is a very rare shoe that was discontinued in 2001 - five years before the murder - and was manufactured at the time only in Ukraine, Brazil and another European country.
A study conducted revealed that apparently a few dozen of this shoe were sold in Israel, and the main users of shoes of this model were immigrants from Eastern Europe who brought the shoes with them to Israel.
In the first trial, Dr. Guy Cooper, an English expert on shoe prints, testified on behalf of the defense.
3295197 (Photo: Official Website, Ministry of Justice)
Since Zadorov's conviction in 2010, the field of shoe prints has received various references in the Israeli legal world. In 2013, Judge Neil Handel ruled in the Supreme Court that shoveling is a problematic and limited sight. However, since that ruling, known as the "Metzgora ruling," in the name of the defendant in the same case, the footprints have also been treated differently in Israeli law.
For example, the Haifa District Court convicted in a murder case, thanks in part to the imprints of the defendant's shoes that were found at the scene.
The opinion in this sentence was presented by Yaron Schur himself.
The convicting panel of judges also included Yosef Elron, who was later appointed to the Supreme Court.
The defense tried to hang on to the Maggora ruling, but the ruling said at the time that "both the Maggora ruling and a number of other Supreme Court rulings stated that this is an acceptable view and a field that is accepted in many developed legal systems, including the United States, Canada and England." "A type of shoe-type evidence is considered admissible circumstantial evidence, and when it joins further evidence, and after the court is convinced of its probative value in the circumstances of the case, it can be used as circumstantial evidence of a defendant's duty."
news
News in Israel
Criminal news and law
Tags
Tair Rada
Roman Zdorov
murder
