Disagreement about execution: compulsory vaccination divides the German Ethics Council - but the decision has been made

Created: 12/22/2021, 10:22 AM

Alena Buyx, Chairwoman of the German Ethics Council.

© Michael Kappeler / dpa

The general compulsory vaccination is hotly debated.

The German Ethics Council is now positioning itself.

But there are internal disagreements.

Berlin - A vaccination rate that is too low in Germany has sparked the debate about a general vaccination requirement for weeks.

Now the German Ethics Council has also positioned itself.

And advocates an expansion of the recently decided compulsory vaccination for staff in facilities such as clinics and nursing homes to "significant parts of the population".

However, this must be flanked with further measures, according to a recommendation by the majority of the independent committee that advises the federal government on ethical issues relating to the corona pandemic.

In addition to nationwide vaccination offers and sufficient vaccines, the vaccine should, as far as possible, be freely chosen.

Direct invitations with personalized appointments, a secure national vaccination register and understandable information are also recommended.

General compulsory vaccination leads to disagreement at the German Ethics Council: Exact details are disputed

A total of 20 of the current 24 ethics council members voted in favor of the recommendation to expand the compulsory vaccination and four against.

However, there are different views on the scope of the expansion.

For example, 13 out of 20 members who are fundamentally in favor of an extension of the mandatory vaccination to all adults who could be vaccinated.

Seven members are in favor of restricting this to adults who belong to corona risk groups such as the elderly or those with previous illnesses.

The Greens health expert Janosch Dahmen sees the majority vote of the council as a "very important guide" for the debate and the decision on compulsory corona vaccination.

Like many politicians, the Ethics Council had to revise its previous position due to the changed situation, said the member of the Bundestag of the German Press Agency.

“As a society, we can only leave the pandemic behind if we are able to learn and remain open to course corrections.” Politicians lose the confidence of the vast majority, especially if they prove incapable of learning.

Ethics Council on general vaccination quota - Bundestag Vice-President Göring-Eckardt pleads for quick new regulations

The ethics council had been asked by the federal and state governments for an assessment. The background to this is that the Bundestag will probably vote at the beginning of next year without parliamentary group specifications on a general vaccination requirement - among other things, Chancellor Olaf Scholz (SPD) had spoken out in favor of this. A first limited corona vaccination obligation was already decided in mid-December: Employees in facilities with vulnerable people such as clinics and nursing homes have to prove by March 15, 2022 that they have been vaccinated or have recovered.

The Ethics Council explained that high vaccination rates are crucial in order to get into a controlled situation. An obligation to vaccinate always represents a significant impairment of legally and morally protected goods. An expansion can only be justified if it can mitigate or prevent serious negative consequences of possible future pandemic waves - such as high mortality, long-term health impairments of large parts of the population or an impending collapse of the health system .

Bundestag Vice-President Katrin Göring-Eckardt pleaded for a quick new regulation.

"The Bundestag should quickly introduce a general vaccination requirement in the new year," said the Green politician to the newspapers of the

.

She invited people to “hold an open and transparent exchange of information on the implementation of a general vaccination requirement in January with experts from science and society across all political groups”.