Xu Shili, principal of Zengcheng Siu Lin School of the Tuen Mun Lutheran Lutheran School, claimed that when the Director of Education Bureau raided the school, he was knocked down by a member of the family church. The trial was resumed in Tuen Mun Court today (22). Magistrate Shi Zuyao said that despite the ruling yesterday The evidence of the case was established, but it was believed that the prosecution witnesses were even contradictory. Principal Xu was unclear about the attack and the injuries. The director of the Education Bureau who witnessed the incident said that he could not see the defendant attacking the principal, and the testimony was full of doubts. , Ruled that the defendant was not guilty.
However, Shiguan alleged that the defendant suddenly rushed forward without reasonable reasons, he was suspicious, and rejected his application for litigation.
The official confession is only enough to rule the evidence
The female defendant Lin Jingxia (39 years old) was charged with assaulting woman Xu Shili outside the Lutheran Lutheran Zengcheng Zhaolin School in Tuen Mun Butterfly Village on June 1, 2021.
Shi Guan ruled that the evidence was established yesterday. The defense said that the defendant wanted to appear in court to defend himself and would call two defense witnesses. However, Shi Guan said that the prosecution evidence was only valid, and the defense finally decided not to call any witnesses. .
The defendant Lin Jingxia was convicted of ordinary assault.
(Photo by Liu Anqi)
There are obvious differences between the principal and the director's confession
The official also ruled that when the principal Xu Shili gave a testimony, he alleged that the defendant rushed between her and Yang Yonghao, the director of school development of the Education Bureau, and that he would bump into her. However, Yang, who was also on the scene at the time, said that the defendant was in the body when the conflict occurred. At the rear right of him, the distance between him and Xu is not enough to accommodate the other person.
Shiguan believes that the two witnesses differed in key plots.
The medical records did not mention the defendant's hand red
In addition, Shiguan also believed that Principal Xu was vacillating when she gave a testimony. She initially accused the defendant of hitting her with her hand, but later changed her statement and said that it might not have been with her hand.
However, Shiguan pointed out that the defendant's closest position to Xu was Xu's left hand. Xu's right hand was far away from the defendant. He had doubts about how the defendant could attack Xu's right hand.
As for Xu's injuries, Xu claimed that the doctor had accused his hands of "red left" after the incident, but the medical records did not mention it.
Yang's evidence is clear and reasonable
Shi Guan continued to point out that another prosecution witness, then Assistant Principal Sun Fujin, and Principal Xu were subordinate to his superiors, although this does not mean that the two were in collusion.
However, he believes that Yang, who is an independent witness, has a clear and reasonable confession and accepts Yang as an honest and reliable witness. Therefore, there are contradictions in the testimony of Xu and Sun and cannot be accepted.
Yang did not see the defendant's assault
Finally, although the defendant rushed to stop Xu and Yang from talking to Yang, his behavior was suspicious, but because the court only accepted Yang’s testimony, Yang said earlier that he had not seen the defendant assault Xu and ruled the defendant for ordinary assault. Not guilty.
Case number: TMCC1584/2021
Parents involved in assault on primary school principals. The director of the Education Bureau raided the school and witnessed conflicts saying that both women were excited about their parents’ involvement in attacking primary school principals. The principal denied prejudice against the defendant and worked consciously. Parent complaints become a source of stress
01News
