When a male police officer was suspected of serving as a district councilor's volunteer work, he asked three people who asked for help due to rental issues to obtain a remuneration of 2,400 yuan for the renewal of the case.
The owner of the case confessed that he originally sought free legal advice from a district councilor due to a tenancy dispute. The other party introduced a male policeman for mediation, but never mentioned the charge. The male policeman claimed that she would charge 800 yuan and asked her not to inform her of the demand. My son also asked her not to call him "Sir Chen" in the tripartite talks. Later it was discovered that the male police had asked the tenants and real estate agents for 800 yuan.
During cross-examination, the defendant pointed out that the owner was willing to pay the mediation fee from the beginning to the end, but "do not want a monk after the fast", but the owner did not agree with the statement.
The defendant Chen Jialin (37 years old) was charged with three counts of soliciting benefits from an agent. He alleged that on October 22 last year, as a volunteer of the district councillor Xie Shuzhen, he separately filed a complaint with the business involved in a leasing dispute in an industrial building. The owner, the tenant and the real estate agent each ask for 800 yuan, a total of 2,400 yuan, as compensation for assisting in the settlement of the three-person rental dispute.
Li Peijun (right), the owner of the business involved, said that the defendant Chen Jialin had helped her call the tenant and the real estate company for mediation, but later demanded 800 yuan as a mediation fee.
(Photo by Li Huina)
The victim alleged that the defendant asked for 800 yuan as a mediation fee and asked her not to tell her son
Li Peijun, the owner of the business involved, confessed that the tenant asked for 200,000 yuan in compensation due to the wrong lease start date and rent-free period in the lease, so she asked district councillor Xie Shuzhen for free legal advice, and later Xie introduced the defendant to help her mediate Event, but did not mention the charge.
The defendant helped her call the tenant and the real estate company for mediation, but later asked for 800 yuan as a mediation fee. She also asked her not to disclose to her son that she “received” the reply at the time, but was surprised that she was about to take a screenshot of the conversation with the defendant. Pass it to the son.
The son reminded her that it was an illegal act, and asked her to delete his response.
Li Xuxu pointed out that the defendant had helped her meet the tenants and waited for the meeting, and asked her not to call herself "Sir Chen" during the meeting, but later claimed that the meeting was cancelled.
The meeting was later carried out without the defendant, and during the meeting, she knew that the defendant also asked the tenant and the real estate agent for 800 yuan.
The defendant Chen Jialin confessed that he had a white card.
(Photo by Li Huina)
The defendant confessed that he had a white card
During cross-examination, the defendant revealed that he had a registration certificate for people with disabilities (commonly known as a white card), and that many social incidents occurred at the time of the incident. Many police officers were attacked and were unwilling to disclose their identity. He questioned Xie’s claim that he had sent a card. Li said he did not know the situation.
Li also stated that she understood that Xie Xie served the citizens free of charge, and said that she had previously asked District Councillors Tu Jinshen and Yang Yu for help, which was also free.
When serving as a district councilor, volunteering involved asking citizens seeking help for 2,400 yuan. The male police showed a warrant to urge the delivery of the online shop with psychiatric defense. The message: the male police is undergoing disciplinary review and has not been suspended. Please return
The defendant accused the victim of knowing to charge but “don’t want a monk after the fast”
The defendant pointed out to Li that she was willing to pay 800 yuan for mediation from beginning to end until the incident was discovered by her son, but Li did not agree.
Li also pointed out that originally he was very grateful for the defendant's help and thought that 800 yuan was not a big sum, but he was worried that paying the money would harm the defendant.
The defendant pointed out to Li that she "don’t want a monk after the fast", knowing that he will charge, but knowing that the incident has been dealt with, but "flying", but Li emphasized that if the two sides negotiated early in the morning, she would collect the money, of course she would. The payment was agreed, but Xie never mentioned the charge.
Case Number: KTCC 1136/2021