The law for controlling social networks, which allows for immediate deletion of content that the court has identified as offensive, is too little and too late.
Call me by any tyrant's name from any dark regime you know, but I think this concept, freedom of expression, has swelled a bit beyond its original dimensions.
The good people who created this freedom did not imagine that people would have access to such a powerful means of transmission as social networks, and that they would harness this freedom to spread violence, incitement, humiliation, harassment, mass recruitment for criminal behavior, harming public figures and public servants, persuading people to prefer Death in agony over a vaccine shot.
It is not for nothing that freedom of speech was regulated until recently.
A person must be able to defend in court what he has said in public.
Prove "I have spoken the truth."
Because if not, then anyone can lie, and if he or she is charismatic enough, in control of the craft of mind games or deeply disturbed, they can harm society as a whole.
And here came the networks, and because of the laziness and antiquity of the legislature and the judiciary, a completely free space was created, in which there was no typist's responsibility for his words.
It is possible to explicitly threaten murder, and it is possible to sexually harass, and it is possible to organize digital assassinations of people, and it is possible to spread false information, mislead, terrorize, and by and large - to be anti-social people, given private, uncensored, unsupervised media, The evil man in his eyes will do.
Whoever says that freedom of expression is absolute, gives freedom to cause harm to society consciously.
In his view there is no such thing as good and bad, but there are different narratives, which are supposed to exist side by side.
There is no truth and no lie, there is more truth and truth.
In some countries these laws of thought are already practiced, and whoever passes them endangers his life, and these countries are socially disintegrating and doomed to extinction even in our lifetime.
Anyone who claims that the new law is intended to censor thoughts, testifies that he himself makes improper use of social networks.
Former Prime Minister Netanyahu even bothered to shoot a video in English and lament to the nations of the world about this law, claiming that they are trying to shut up.
Mr. Netanyahu, there are mouths that deserve to be silenced, because an unbearable stench comes out of them, whether they are vaccinators, or keyboardists or ticking offenders.
Let them continue to rage this consciously and intentionally crack the cohesion of society, the relations of one another, the possibility of producing a functioning state.
Yes, need supervision.
Need a law.
I vote in favor.
And yes, I have a picture of Mussolini over the bed.
Perverts
Ya Rabbi, where did all these perverts come from, may Gd have mercy.
From every crack, from every bureau, from every class and education, from every color and inclination, from every faith and age, they crawl like naked after the rain.
Ugh, people, what the hell are you doing?
What do you not know?
Where did you forget that the person in front of you has a soul, just like your soul?
Or do you have no soul at all?
Has anyone in your life taken your connection from your soul, until you know how to distinguish between good and evil?
Until instead of pitying the other and wanting to benefit him in his life, you kill him soul?
Have we always had so many dangerous perverts among us and not talked about it, or have social conditions now been created for their flourishing?
Evidence of abusive adults has also been there once, but there has never been such a scale of abusive sexual behaviors in teens.
There have always been a few, even in the elementary school I attended there was a case.
But not like that.
Not every day a more terrible affair.
And the question was asked why, and the answer is given: porn.
Children today are exposed to porn from the age of 8. According to reports from schools, at the age of the division boys sit at recess and watch porn in groups. Some children watch it in front of the teacher in class. And once the brain is exposed to such a stimulus level, huge amounts of dopamine, the addiction hormone, flood the brain. The child, smart as he may be, loses it. He's addicted. He just wants it. And more than that every day. And when he lives in a world of staged and filmed sex, and has no tools to assess the credibility of what he sees, then like a kid wearing a Superman robe and trying to fly, that kid will try to do what is shown on screen.
And what is shown on the screen is bad.
In almost all sex videos the woman is just a tool for lust, her pleasures are not taken into account because they are less well photographed.
She enjoys when people she does not know do to her things that no woman in the world wants.
The young men think that if they do to the society from the stratum what they have seen, she will really enjoy, and they will be the naked superheroes they know from the secret surf window.
Then they get into big trouble, and police, and media, and hell, and they do not understand what happened, they just did what they saw in the tutorial video.
A parent charter is required to filter out sexual content for children.
Those who do not join may one day find themselves looking for a good lawyer, it will cost as much as it costs, all for the child.
Cashiers
A leading marketing network has started experimenting with super-smart carts.
Hello cashiers, from now on every product that goes into the cart is identifying, and binding on the spot.
I liked.
I've been using the self-service checkouts for a long time wherever there is, I think I'm talented enough to pass a barcode in front of a red light beam.
When I make an account of myself I try to adapt to the movement of an experienced cashier, from taking the product to laying it there is a harmonious movement of approaching the reader, waving and distancing without stopping and without sharp angles.
It gives me a good feeling about my abilities.
Admittedly, when I am required to separate each trophy in a trophy quartet of some delicacy, I somewhat doubt the quality of human engineering that has guided the programmers.
But understand that it will further develop and perfect, and in the near future I will only think of a product and already be charged.
I like technology.
Happily embrace her if she suits me.
Digital bank?
An app instead of a clerk?
Parking lots without a guard that charges money at the exit, but a camera that knows me and a parking widget that pays for me?
Love.
A world of revenge.
Of course, provided they continue to worry about those who are unable to cross the technological barrier.
Only I'm not sure I know where all the people who ran all these services went.
The parking lot guards, the bank clerks, the cashiers.
These are tens of thousands of people, soon hundreds of thousands.
Where are they going?
What do they work for?
Technological advancement means harming the weak, because the weak are the ones whose jobs are being replaced.
What are we doing to help these people?
One should pay attention to the margins of the road on which progress travels, because if the price of progress is sacrifices on the side of the road, I do not want to continue the journey until I know everyone is fine, found a job, learned a craft, come back to life.
Why should not every company that replaces its employees with instruments pay the National Fund for Upgrading and Adjusting the Workplace that we will soon build, in order to train employees for jobs that have not yet been invented?
This column was written by Microsoft's new column generator.
avrigilad@gmail.com
Were we wrong?
Fixed!
If you found an error in the article, we'll be happy for you to share it with us