The Inquisition was established in the 13th century to deal with what was perceived as a deviation from the example of the Catholic Church.
Her interrogators hunted down "sinners" and punished them.
The hardest of them, who persisted even after the "period of grace" and did not denounce other "perverts," were punished and even tortured by monks who adhered to a radical interpretation of the Bible.
The harsh revelations of this inquisition were eliminated as early as the 19th century.
Recently, the zealots of another sect have been trying to "restore the crown to its former glory": to hunt down "perverts" from their extremist teachings, to punish them, and to persecute their daring comrades, Rahmana Letzelen, to think.
The devil was replaced by the "privileged" white man;
Catholic Christianity has been replaced by the human rights religion, which focuses on its pigment-dense "victims";
The inquisitors from the Mandatory orders were replaced by predatory purists from academia, the media and the arts.
The punishment is merciful from a fire on the stake: the "cancellation" of the pervert and his legacy, his virtual crucifixion in the town square and the loss of his livelihood.
The bad news is that the political correctness think tank police have managed to feed the language and distort media reports, throw public de-legitimization into what does not reconcile with their radical social and political fixations and release any "victim", real or fake, from responsibility for the consequences of his actions.
Young criminals are "children at risk", and even in adulthood it is clear "pushed into the arms of crime" due to their difficult childhood and lack of community centers; imprisoned terrorists are "security prisoners"; all infiltrators to Israel staying there are "asylum seekers"; Spouses do not work for a living are the "weakened" (not "weak", God forbid: we, the "privileged", "weakened" them); violence between Arab clans is attributed to the neglect of police treatment of criminal organizations; The most prominent of the Arabs; the barbaric pogroms of Arabs in Acre and Lod are labeled, along with the repulsive rage of Jewish hooligans, as "violence on both sides," while hypocritically ignoring the praise of Arab public leaders in Israel for pogroms in a respectful context of national mission; Obedience to their last whim, disqualifies as "Racism is an aversion to the oppression of women in Arab and Islamic societies.
The good news is that the same factors degrade to the outrageous extremism of any culture whose sanity will happen to him.
The Boston Lyrical Opera has in its ignorance rejected Puccini's production of Madame Butterfly for fear of racism.
The Berlin Ballet disqualified Tchaikovsky's "The Nutcracker" for an oriental dance that was defined as "clearly racist."
The Harry Potter company, JK Rowling, was attacked as "transphobic" and confiscated by "progressives" because it dared to link biology to culture by distinguishing between men and women.
The film "Gone with the Wind" is banned due to the description of the relationship shown in it between slaves and their masters.
To the puritanical guillotine were also brought the books of Dr. Horse and the Calabrian Finn and the series "A Little House in the Arava."
The morbid distortion peaked when New Yorkers actually decided to discriminate against whites in distributing medicine to Corona.
In the Bible, where God is mentioned in male language and His break with the people is indicated through the word of men only, they have not touched, yet.
It is not just the fixations that this puritanical sect controls inwardly.
Its members have taken over, in the democratic part of the American public and in Western Europe, a considerable part of academia, the media, social networks and the world of culture, and succeed, in their predation, in eliminating careers, harming livelihoods and especially reigning in terror.
In Israel, their grip is still partial and vulnerable.
It deserves to be fought, and not, God forbid, by adopting values from the opposite pole: radical purity is wrong, of course, and dangerous because of its undermining of the free discourse.
Pluralism devoid of fanaticism and self-righteousness makes it possible to examine behavior in the historical and social context and to find out, out of freedom of thought and without ideological terrorism, the changing balance of mornings between values given a built-in tension between them.
Were we wrong?
Fixed!
If you found an error in the article, we'll be happy for you to share it with us