We have all noticed in recent years that everywhere, in the press as in research texts, the concept of inclusion has replaced that of "good".
We no longer say that such and such a discourse, such a reform, such a teaching, is good - probably because we no longer know very clearly what are the criteria of good, if there are any.
But it is said to be "inclusive".
This is enough to classify favorably and in the camp of virtue.
See also
The "inclusive" language puts the European Union under tension
A change of name is never innocent.
When an entire society instinctively sets out to replace one word with another, it means a lot.
The appearance and the plenipotentiary deployment of the "inclusive" translates the collective recognition of a new criterion of good, supplanting the previous criteria, of Christian origin.
“Inclusion” does not only refer to a desire to welcome into society or the community.
It is not a loose term, and as used today it has a very specific meaning.
Faced with an external or foreign element ...
This article is for subscribers only.
You have 85% left to discover.
Freedom is also to go to the end of a debate.
Continue reading your article for € 1 the first month
I ENJOY IT
Already subscribed?
Log in