Gilles-William Goldnadel is a lawyer and essayist. Each week, he deciphers the news for FigaroVox. He published
a Manual of Resistance to Far-Left Fascism
(Nouvelles éditions de Passy, 2021).
Are there, in the presidential mind, some people whom we could, in essence, "piss off" publicly, decently, resolutely, nobly, learnedly, with impunity and others whom we should treat with more obsequiousness? ?
And would this radical difference in treatment be shared by part of media society?
Before answering this literally essential question, let us first address the strictly formal question.
Very recently I wrote a "Manual of resistance to far-left fascism" in which I advocate a quiet
"cambronnism"
.
In other words, I recommend to those companions who walk with me on the national road to say with a smile
"fuck you!"
to the little spirits who cover them with a disgrace every day less messy.
But this serenity is the exact opposite of boasting of wanting to publicly cover with smelly excrement unvaccinated a priori honest fellow citizens who are held under their supreme control.
To put it more clearly, citizens who are often grossly caricatured, undoubtedly in the gross error, but certainly not in the illegality.
Triple vaccinated avocado faith.
As for the use of rudeness, it seems to me even less tolerable, coming from a sovereign in office who posed yesterday in Jupiter, than from an ordinary candidate immediately blacklisted for having pointed his middle finger at the nose of a harpy .
For what obscure reasons [...] does a president reserve his swear words for ordinary citizens and treat extraordinary delinquents with more syrupy civilities?
Gilles-William Goldnadel
But let's go back to the bottom and its mysteries.
For what obscure reasons, which in our opinion sit in the unconscious, a president who passes without deception for intelligent, reserves his swear words for ordinary citizens and treats with more syrupy civilities extraordinary delinquents?
Would there be pissed off naturally and ideologically "pissed off"?
Thus, while he today expressly denies citizenship to unvaccinated French people, the President of the Republic in 2017 held the forfeiture of nationality of Islamist terrorists as a nasty measure.
To put it more bluntly, there is no question of pissing off these strange citizens who kill French people and holding them as strangers.
Likewise, I have never heard Emmanuel Macron use the language of the carter to say that he was determined to
"piss off"
illegal foreigners who remain without rights in the national territory against the will of the vast majority of a French people vaccinated against the ideological virus of submission to multiculturalism.
Nor have I heard him want to
“piss off”
the criminals in these neighborhoods who have been said to be sensitive, not to say immigrants who rot life - I was going to write
“piss off”
- the inhabitants of these cities.
Obviously, Mr Shaath, an Egyptian-Palestinian anti-Zionist (to remain amiable), does not belong to this category of individuals who could be "pissed off" with impunity.
Gilles-William Goldnadel
And to take the most recent and concrete example, last Saturday, our incumbent President of the Republic cracked a strong urban official statement to openly welcome the arrival on national soil of Mr. Shaath, released by the Egyptian authorities who consider him a terrorist.
This one is however one of the principal persons in charge of this BDS which illegally boycots this Jewish state of which he curses the existence.
Obviously, this Egyptian-Palestinian anti-Zionist (to remain amiable) does not belong either to this category of individuals who could be "pissed off" with impunity and in the media without being splashed.
To all these, our sovereign prefers to use a language certainly less courageous but much more majestic.
Because in the unconscious hollow of the obsequious, raw French is only reserved for the lepers' dead ends.