The Omicron epidemic in Hong Kong has affected Hung Weimin's birthday party, which will affect the first meeting of the Legislative Council and the Chief Executive's Q&A session tomorrow (12th).
Tian Beichen, a member of the Legislative Council of the Actual Politics Roundtable, threatened to try to question the Chief Executive Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor on the loopholes in the crew's epidemic prevention. Wait.
Tian Beichen accepted an inquiry from "Hong Kong 01" and said that if he was asked tomorrow to ask, "I won't hold back," he would continue to "greet" Carrie Lam, emphasizing that he had repeatedly stated that the quarantine requirements for cargo plane personnel should not be relaxed, but the government insisted that it required Carrie Lam apologized for causing the fifth wave of the outbreak.
However, Lin Jianfeng of the Pakatan Harapan believes that there should be no random accountability until the responsibility for the incident is revealed.
Some new members of the Democratic Alliance for Betterment of Hong Kong believe that "the new council should seize the time to do practical things, and there is no point in making a fuss."
Some members also pointed out that the government launched an anti-epidemic fund in a timely manner to respond to some demands. It is expected that the atmosphere of the question and answer session will be relatively calm. It seems that many people in the establishment have no plans to point the finger at the government.
Tian Beichen threatened to "greet" Carrie Lam at the Chief Executive's Q&A session tomorrow.
(File photo/Photo by Zheng Zifeng)
Tian Beichen said that he was extremely dissatisfied with Carrie Lam's anti-epidemic work, and believed that the government's launch of an anti-epidemic fund would not be able to alleviate the public's anger. The issue of quality of life... A lot of people in Hong Kong are going crazy, and they want to stay in the housing company according to their families."
Tian Beichen emphasized that he has repeatedly stated that the quarantine requirements for cargo aircraft crews should not be relaxed, but the government has always insisted on relaxing them, and has not done a good job in monitoring home quarantine.
Tian Beichen wrote to Carrie Lam, expressing that she raised six questions and hoped that she would respond at the Chief Executive's Q&A session tomorrow:
1. Why are airlines allowed to adopt their own self-regulatory home health monitoring?
Did the authorities not see any obvious loopholes before the incident?
2. The home health monitoring has been significantly improved after the improvement of electronic wristbands and other equipment. Why not adopt the effective electronic wristband system?
3. It is alleged that the airline used "passenger aircraft to cargo aircraft to return" to increase the number of crew members exempt from quarantine. Is the incident true?
Were the authorities informed of the relevant arrangements before the incident?
Does the practice qualify for a government exemption?
4. Will the government authorities prosecute the relevant persons?
5. How to punish the relevant airlines?
Should regulators be held accountable?
6. Will Carrie Lam apologize to the public for the wrong policies and ineffective supervision of his departments?
Mai Meijuan criticized Chen Fan during the live broadcast earlier.
Mai Meijuan criticizes Chen Fan for allowing the cargo crew to be exempted from quarantine for causing loopholes
In addition to Tian Beichen, Mai Meijuan of the Federation of Trade Unions also publicly criticized Chen Fan, Secretary for Transport and Housing. She criticized Chen Fan for allowing cargo crew members to be exempted from quarantine, which caused many crew members to be exempted from quarantine. ”, referring to the situation that caused the virus to spread in the community, severely criticized Chen for “You are nice guy but you are exhausted in Hong Kong”, and asked him to apologize for the incident.
Other establishment parties do not have much opinion. Lin Jianfeng urges the violators to be dealt with impartially.
As the largest party in the establishment, more than one member of the Democratic Alliance for Betterment of Hong Kong expressed that he has no intention of criticizing the government for its anti-epidemic work.
Some members of the Democratic Alliance for Betterment of Hong Kong said that they believed that no voice in the party deliberately pointed the finger at the government, and believed that all aspects of the incident should be reviewed.
There are also new members of the party who believe that the question-and-answer session should focus on practical matters, and "it's meaningless to make trouble."
Lam Kin-fung, a member of the Executive Council and Legislative Council member of the Pakatan Harapan, said he agreed with what Lam said that the incident should be thoroughly investigated and dealt with strictly, to find out whether the actions of the various stakeholders involved in the incident violated the rules, and to understand the ins and outs of the incident as soon as possible. .
He stressed, "Hong Kong is an area under the rule of law, citizens should abide by the law, and those who violate the law should be dealt with fairly."
Other members of the establishment party described Carrie Lam as "eye-catching" this time, referring to the government's pre-announcement of the launch of the Anti-epidemic Fund 5.0 in response to some of the establishment's demands. It is estimated that the atmosphere of tomorrow's Q&A session will be calmer. In addition, the recent "Hongmen Banquet" The incident is sensitive, "I don't know how to receive the information", it is better to "stay in the front line" tomorrow.
NDP chairman Yip Liu Shuyi said earlier that she did not understand why so many members went to the dinner, saying that it would be better if members had time to read documents.
Ban on dine-in food︱Tian Beichen explodes the crew’s quarantine and hands-free belts next week’s Q&A session will collectively greet Carrie Lam, Liu Piao, Xu Yingwei, and the government and society to ask “so many entertainments to kill ghosts”: it’s better to look at the documents than Hung Weimin’s party︱The FEHD initially believes that there are no Following the regulations Carrie Lam: The number of guests far exceeds the regulations Hong Weimin Party︱Chen Jiajue: There is no staff on site to check Anxin travel basically depends on self-discipline