The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Reactions to the verdict on state torture in Syria: "This is really historic"

2022-01-13T12:22:32.458Z


The Higher Regional Court in Koblenz has sentenced the Syrian Anwar Raslan for state torture in Syria. Human rights activists see this as an important signal, and Justice Minister Buschmann has also given praise.


Enlarge image

A Syrian activist with pictures of Syrian civil war victims before the Koblenz Higher Regional Court

Photo: BERND LAUTER / AFP

The judgment of the Higher Regional Court (OLG) Koblenz in the process of state torture in Syria met with much applause.

Human rights organizations welcome the guilty verdict against Syrian Anwar Raslan for torturing at least 4,000 people in a state prison in Damascus, murder in 27 and dangerous assault in 25 cases.

The head of

Human Rights Watch

, Kenneth Roth, told journalists in Geneva: "This is really historic." The verdict is "a significant moment for civilians who have survived torture and sexual abuse in Syrian prisons," the organization said .

Federal Justice Minister

Marco Buschmann (FDP)

recommended the judgment as a model for criminal prosecution in other countries.

"I would appreciate it if other constitutional states follow this example," said Buschmann.

"Anyone who has committed crimes against humanity must not find safe retreats anywhere." The pioneering work of the Koblenz court deserves to be "recognized worldwide".

The

German Association of Judges (DRB)

also attaches great importance to the judgment of the OLG Koblenz.

The decision "sends the important signal to the perpetrators and their victims: war criminals must expect prosecution in Germany," said DRB Federal Managing Director Sven Rebehn.

Signal "in the global fight against impunity"

The court decision is an important signal "in the global fight against impunity", said Markus N. Beeko, Secretary General of

Amnesty International in Germany

.

Amnesty now expects "that in Germany and in other countries, building on this knowledge, further processes will be initiated in accordance with the principle of universal law."

Wolfgang Kaleck, Secretary General of the

European Center for Consitutional and Human Rights (ECCHR)

, which, together with partner lawyers, had supported 14 co-plaintiffs in the process, stated in a statement: »Despite all the deficits in international criminal justice, the conviction of Anwar R. what the principle of world law can achieve - and that such processes can be carried out in Germany and Europe «.

The trial against Raslan began 108 days ago in April 2020 and caused a stir internationally.

More than 80 witnesses were summoned, and a number of victims of torture appeared as co-plaintiffs.

It is the first case of this kind in which an actor in the Syrian civil war had to answer for his actions.

The fact that the process was conducted in Germany is due to the so-called world law principle in international criminal law.

Accordingly, acts may also be negotiated in this country that are not directly related to Germany.

The convicted Raslan was recognized by victims of torture after his escape to Germany and was finally caught by the authorities.

fek / dpa / AFP

Source: spiegel

All news articles on 2022-01-13

You may like

News/Politics 2024-04-04T23:57:03.238Z

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.