The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Our Truth Tax Israel today

2022-01-20T11:43:26.620Z


I am in favor of setting up a commission of inquiry into the submarine affair This week is a parable and a parable, and also a parable. It started with a plea deal and Aharon Barak, and continued with sin and its punishment, that is, the submarines that cost double. A report by Barak Ravid in Walla stated that Bennett revealed that the price increase was due to a "significant delay in negotiations during the Netanyahu government." The message resounded about inflatable su


This week is a

parable and a parable, and also a parable. It started with a plea deal and Aharon Barak, and continued with sin and its punishment, that is, the submarines that cost double.


A report by Barak Ravid in Walla stated that Bennett revealed that the price increase was due to a "significant delay in negotiations during the Netanyahu government." The


message resounded about inflatable submarines at the Balfour Church of Hatred despite a police investigation that found no flaw in Netanyahu.


Yes, yes, the delay in the progress of the deal was due to the media noise.

The Germans said it themselves.

In March 2019, it was reported in "Globes" that contrary to a report that the investigation in Germany was opened following an Israeli request, the general prosecutor's office in the city of Bochum claims that the case went from "follow-up" to "preliminary investigation".

The investigation was closed in February 2021.


At your disposal, a short journey through time through Raviv Drucker and Boogie Ya'alon, the chattering source of allegations of corruption in submarines: On November 17, 2016, Drucker publishes a post-viral post. How viral? Drucker Course Blog. Drucker writes that Ya'alon reveals in February 2016 that Netanyahu is about to sign a memorandum of understanding with the Germans during his visit to Germany. "This is where the confrontation between Ya'alon and the Prime Minister broke out," Drucker writes. Why enter into a contract with payment dates and delivery dates for a submarine that will arrive in another 14 years? Maybe the technology will be different, maybe there will be a different shipyard, maybe the prices will be different.


"Netanyahu argued that the time Merkel is still in must be used. The debate did not end until Netanyahu's trip to Germany. When he was in Germany, in talks between the prime minister and the defense minister, Ya'alon told Netanyahu that if it was Merkel's presence then there was no need to sign the contract. "Merkel will sign a general declaration of intent that will express a willingness to sell three submarines to Israel in the future."


This week Drucker surprised on TV when he mentioned how Netanyahu and Ya'alon were arguing, noting that Netanyahu wanted to close a quick deal to supply three future submarines that would replace the aging submarines back in the Merkel era.

This will no longer happen and will cost another billion two hundred euros.


In real time, I replied to Drucker in a long Facebook post, which ended like this: "I also have a question and think about it well, contrary to what is said there is still no purchase contract but only a memorandum of understanding with the Germans regarding future submarine purchase. Who has an interest in sabotaging the purchase?"


That's why I'm in favor of a commission of inquiry.

Yes, let's find out who sewed this plot.

Investigate everything including everything, with an emphasis on the story of South Korea.

Dear readers, please, South Korea.

I was not surprised that

Netanyahu turned to Aharon Barak to mediate with Mandelblit.

Above the pages of this newspaper in September 2020, I too, the little one, called on him to intervene in the revelation in the files of the Alps.

"I have held and I hold from you my lord, a man whose mouth and heart are equal," I wrote, "a legal genius, the Rebbe of Human Rights, and therefore precisely now, at this time your voice is required.

You can not stand in the face of the flood of things that are revealed in the Alpine files and the conduct of the State Attorney's Office and the police ... 'While I am sitting in court - I stand trial', you stated, Accountability and accountability. "


Since September, the trial protocol has continued to accumulate and provide us with a record of the injustice and horror produced by law enforcement.

After the testimony of Hefetz and his investigators, it can already be determined that the accusations against Netanyahu are null and void compared to what the law enforcement agencies have done here.


In 1927, in the Olmsteid judgment, Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis, whom Barak admires, ruled that "a crime remains a crime even if it is committed on behalf of the government."

Barak, now clear, is well aware of all this happening.

Netanyahu's lawyers presented him with the evidence from the court, so he is also aware that there is no bribe.

Otherwise, let me assume, he would not have given a hand in a plea deal in which we omit a bribery clause.


It was expected that we would hear sharp statements against the interrogation exercises taken from dark regimes, against the reality of an interrogee sitting covered in blisters and the interrogators mocking him, against phishing investigations opened without the ombudsman's approval. The fact that he allows Mandelblit to put the focus on the disgrace that will keep Netanyahu out of public life proves what they claimed from the beginning - they are not looking for justice or truth here. Says - what I claimed before was not true, they did not sew a case for me. I am sorry, Mr. Barak. Even if Netanyahu signs a plea deal and admits, for me, his confession is akin to a confession in the Inquisition. I love Netanyahu and understand him. 20 years of iron combs.


Make no mistake, distrust in the system will only increase.

And you are Prof. Barak, an instrument of action methods of totalitarian states.

Where is Brandeis and where are you.

The proof of the existence

of that camp seeking freedom and justice is also embodied in the mass fundraising project initiated by my beloved friend Yinon Magal. An initiative that managed to provoke the well-known Robin Hood reflex on the left. At first they mocked and cared for the poor baboons, but as the amount of money accumulated, the level of pressure rose to the point of activating attorney batteries and turning to every possible source, including the registrar of associations and the tax authority, to sabotage and stop


the

fundraiser.

Nor do they understand that for us this is not "the State of Israel against Netanyahu" but "the State of Israel against Netanyahu's voters."


After you have invested hundreds of millions of shekels in our tax money to oust the man of our choice, the least we can do is donate money to reveal the truth.

This is our truth tax.

And the truth is that it should not be framed as a donation, but as an investment.

Investing in our future and the future of our children.

This is not a legal event but a political event.

We will not forget nor forgive. 

Were we wrong?

Fixed!

If you found an error in the article, we'll be happy for you to share it with us

Source: israelhayom

All news articles on 2022-01-20

You may like

Trends 24h

News/Politics 2024-03-27T16:45:54.081Z
News/Politics 2024-03-28T06:04:53.137Z

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.