Elysée polls: Claude Guéant and four ex-relatives of Sarkozy fixed on their fate

The former Minister of the Interior Claude Guéant as well as four former advisers and collaborators of Nicolas Sarkozy, suspected of favoritism or embezzlement of public funds, will be fixed on their fate Friday January 21 at the beginning of the afternoon, in the the so-called Élysée polls affair.

Read alsoThe trial of the Élysée polls begins

Will Claude Guéant appear in the box? The presence of the former senior state clerk, 77, imprisoned in the Health prison for more than a month because of a previous conviction, remains uncertain: he should ask to be represented by his lawyer . First for a former tenant of Beauvau, Claude Guéant was imprisoned on December 13. The Paris Court of Appeal ruled in early November that he was not paying the fine and damages he was imposed on time in 2017 in the case of cash bonuses from the Ministry of Health. 'Interior. He made a request for release which was considered on Wednesday and will be decided on February 7.

This judicial past telescoped the trial of the Élysée polls, which took place in October and November, leading to an extremely rare reopening of the debates, more than three weeks after the end of the hearings.

He also led the National Financial Prosecutor's Office (PNF) to increase its requisitions against Claude Guéant: considering that he does not

, the prosecution asked for one year's imprisonment, against six months previously, as well a fine of 10,000 euros for favoritism and embezzlement of public funds through negligence.

In the name of the “separation of powers”

For a month, the court immersed itself in the exercise of power under Sarkozy, examining the millions of euros in political advice and opinion research billed by the companies of Patrick Buisson and Pierre Giacometti, as well as by the Ipsos institute. The former head of state has never been implicated in this case, because he is covered by the presidential immunity guaranteed by the Constitution. But he was summoned, in an unprecedented decision, to appear as a witness on November 2: during a brief and tense hearing, Nicolas Sarkozy refused to answer questions from President Benjamin Blanchet, in the name of the

.

For the prosecution, the disputed expenses were the subject of favoritism, because they were awarded without advertising or a call for tenders.

In question: 2.7 million euros for Patrick Buisson, 2.1 million for Pierre Giacometti and 1.5 million for Ipsos.

Patrick Buisson, 72, a former influential inspiration to the president, is also being prosecuted for embezzlement of public funds, due to two contracts under which he was paid 10,000 euros per month for advice and could also deliver surveys at his discretion.

Between 2007 and 2009, the PNF counted 235 opinion polls, bought and then resold with margins of 65 to 71%, for a profit of 1.4 million euros.

Read alsoElysée polls trial: Nicolas Sarkozy in court

The public prosecutor has requested two years' imprisonment, including one year and a fine of 100,000 euros against Patrick Buisson, also suspected of misuse of corporate assets, as well as a fine of 550,000 euros against his companies Publifact and Publi-Opinion. For former pollster Pierre Giacometti, the prosecution asked for a six-month suspended prison sentence and a 70,000 euro fine - with an additional 250,000 euro fine for his company No Com. A penalty of 500,000 euros has been requested for Ipsos. The PNF was more lenient in its requisitions with the then director of cabinet, Emmanuelle Mignon (10,000 euros fine), as with the former technical adviser "opinion" Julien Vaulpré (5,000 euros fine).

In response, the defense harpooned the

of the prosecutors, pleading the general release by arguing that in 2007, the public procurement code did not apply to the Élysée, according to a

perpetuated since De Gaulle . It is precisely under Sarkozy's five-year term that the first calls for tenders for the presidency under the Fifth Republic will be made, argued the lawyers, denouncing a desire to apply the law

and to sanction those who have

. The defense of Patrick Buisson also refuted any embezzlement of public money, ensuring in particular that the

applied actually corresponded to a

of his mission for the Head of State.