Queen: Now Meghan's confidant is making serious allegations against her - "publicly burned"
Created: 01/21/2022, 19:46
By: Christina Denk
At the request of the Queen, Prince Andrew resigned all his titles after the abuse allegations.
But a royal expert raises serious allegations.
He draws comparisons to Harry and Meghan.
London – The headlines about the British royal family never stop.
Prince Andrew has been accused of molesting Virginia Giuffre, now 61.
A motion to challenge the US lawsuit was denied.
Now the Queen's son has had to relinquish all his military titles.
His mother herself had initiated the procedure.
She drew conclusions from the allegations against Andrew.
But the timing is confusing.
Because the accusation has been circulating for a long time.
British journalist and Meghan's confidante, Omid Scobie, raises serious allegations against the Queen.
Queen: Meghan's confidante criticizes royal "protection ring" around Prince Andrew
In an article by the British news portal
inews
Omid Scobie openly criticizes the Queen's actions.
It was undoubtedly a tough decision for the Queen to "remove her favorite child from the family business" and put her public life ahead of her maternal instincts, according to the Finding Freedom author.
But when it comes to timing, Scobie sees a clear problem.
"Andrew's punishment was not a result of his disregard for the values of the Queen and Royals," Scobie said. "Instead, it was the threat to the Windsor brand and family that ultimately compelled the institution to act." "Ring of Protection" that exists around Andrew is confusing, Scobie said.
Especially when you compare the treatment to Prince Harry's.
Royal expert criticizes Queen: Harry was "publicly burned"
Prince Harry and his wife Meghan had to give up all their titles and privileges shortly after the Megxit in early 2020.
They then moved to Canada and then to Los Angeles.
Harry "was publicly burned and stripped of all achievements and royal privileges before stepping foot out of the country," says royal expert Scobie in his article.
There was no "benevolent support for the Duke of Sussex" although he only wanted to protect his family from an "unhealthy environment".
Prince Andrew is accused of abuse.
A Royal expert now accuses the Queen of her behavior in the case.
© Joe Giddens/PA Wire/dpa
Andrew, meanwhile, took 26 months to be brought to justice, Scobie writes.
The first allegations against the Queen's son were made at the end of 2019. Andrew had then already resigned from his public duties.
Now his titles followed.
"When the selfish behavior of a pompous prince is quietly protected but Harry is not, simply because Andrew doesn't endanger the system, it's clear that this is an institution whose moral compass is in dire need of repair," the royal expert said .
Protection of Prince Andrew: There had been warnings before
It is impossible to deny the Queen's achievements over the past 70 years.
But with Andrew's support, she's risking doing a lot of damage, writes Omid Scobie at the end of his post.
Nobility expert Nicholl warned last October that protecting Andrew could damage the Queen's image.
Experts also assume that Harry's latest lawsuit for police protection in Great Britain should upset the Queen.
(chd)