The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Guy Pervillé: "The Pieds-noirs have just obtained unprecedented satisfaction from Macron"

2022-01-26T18:39:44.536Z


INTERVIEW - By recognizing the culpable responsibility of France in the massacre of dozens of supporters of French Algeria, on March 24, 1962 rue d'Isly, the President of the Republic comes out of a memory dominated by repentance, estimates the historian.


Guy Pervillé is professor emeritus of contemporary history, author at Vendémiaire editions of

An iconoclastic history of the Algerian war and its memory (Vendémiaire editions).

To discover

  • Yves Thréard presents Le Club Le Figaro Presidentielle, our new political program

LE FIGARO.

- What happened on March 26, 1962, rue d'Isly in Algiers?

Guy PERVILLE.

We are nine days after the Evian agreements, signed on March 18, and the French of Algeria supporters of French Algeria call to converge during a peaceful demonstration towards the district of Bab-el-Oued.

The course supposes to pass through a barrier of the forces of order, held by Algerian skirmishers integrated into the French army.

When the crowd goes to the spot, a shooting breaks out, triggered by the soldiers.

According to the official report, 49 civilians are killed among the protesters, in reality certainly more, perhaps 70.

Read alsoAlgerian War: the massacre of the Pieds-noirs by the FLN on July 5, 1962 in Oran must be "recognized", urges Macron

How to explain this shooting of unarmed demonstrators?

An amateur historian, Francis Mézières, has done extensive work on this event, which he…

This article is for subscribers only.

You have 80% left to discover.

Cultivating your freedom is cultivating your curiosity.

Subscription without obligation

1€ THE FIRST MONTH

Already subscribed?

Login

Source: lefigaro

All news articles on 2022-01-26

You may like

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.