The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Presidential 2022: Éric Zemmour figures his program at 60 billion per year

2022-03-11T22:10:51.690Z


INFO LE FIGARO - The final project of the Reconquest candidate! has some 400 measurements.


The attacks follow and resemble each other.

“You are an ideologue, you are not concrete (…) You will be a powerless president.”

On the set of TF1 and LCI, the candidate Les Républicains, Valérie Pécresse, multiplies the trials in vagueness and lack of credibility against the proposals of her opponent Éric Zemmour.

The essayist replies by mocking the changes of foot and ideological reversals of the president of the Île-de-France region.

To discover

  • Compare the programs of the candidates for the 2022 presidential election

  • Eric Zemmour, his supporters, his travels... Follow his campaign with the Figaro application

  • Yves Thréard presents Le Club Le Figaro Presidentielle, our new political program

Read also

Pécresse-Zemmour debate: what the teams of the two candidates thought of it

Still, behind the scenes, a spirit fulminates.

Jonathan Nadler, coordinator of the candidate's program Reconquête!, logs without interruption, with nearly 500 contributors, on Éric Zemmour's proposals since January 2021:

"We had to have the same level of requirements as François's program Fillon in 2017. We have reached the same level of technicality and rendering”

, proclaims the thirty-year-old and former investment banker.

The complete and final version of Éric Zemmour's presidential program unveiled at

Le Figaro

spans a…

This article is for subscribers only.

You have 72% left to discover.

Cultivating your freedom is cultivating your curiosity.

Keep reading your article for 1€ the first month

I ENJOY IT

Already subscribed?

Login

Source: lefigaro

All news articles on 2022-03-11

You may like

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.