The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Dieudonné will be tried for defamation after accusing Valls of sexual assault

2022-03-14T15:42:17.658Z


An investigating judge from Nanterre (Hauts-de-Seine) requested the referral to a criminal court of Dieudonné for defamation, after the...


An investigating judge in Nanterre (Hauts-de-Seine) requested the referral to a criminal court of Dieudonné for defamation, after the broadcast of a video in which he accuses Manuel Valls of sexual assault, according to his order consulted Monday March 14 by AFP.

The order, dated Friday, does not indicate the date of the trial of the controversial comedian, now 56 years old.

Read alsoDieudonné indicted after accusing Manuel Valls of sexual assault

The video in question was broadcast on October 22, 2020 on Dieudonné Mbala Mbala's website and public Telegram account, according to the order, which specifies that a rogatory commission made it possible to confirm that he was "

well the author words

".

In this video, now unavailable online, Dieudonné said he was "

aware

" of a complaint filed by a "

young girl

" against Manuel Valls, presented as an "

aggressor of good women

".

Complaint filed against Manu

,” he assured.

Manuel Valls had filed a complaint on November 3, 2020.

Read alsoDieudonné sentenced to 200 day-fine of 30 euros for concealment of fraud

"

We are delighted that Dieudonné Mbala Mbala will soon answer in court for his grossly defamatory remarks towards Manuel Valls

", reacted Monday to AFP the latter's counsel, Me Thibault de Montbrial.

For his part, Me Jacques Verdier, Dieudonné's lawyer, did not wish to comment.

Dieudonné has been convicted in France on numerous occasions for racial slurs or incitement to hatred.

Source: lefigaro

All news articles on 2022-03-14

You may like

News/Politics 2024-03-10T13:38:16.362Z

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.