The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

What is the relationship between menstrual cycle disturbances reported by some women and the COVID-19 vaccine?

2022-03-25T22:46:52.561Z


After receiving the injection, some women reported heavier bleeding, early or late periods, and other abnormalities. A scientist explains why there is no reason to be alarmed.


By Vallivana Rodrigo Casares -

The Conversation

A few months after the start of the COVID-19 vaccination, we began to hear that some women had suffered alterations in their menstrual cycle after taking the first dose.

Heavier bleeding, earlier or later periods, changes in duration or amenorrhea were some of the announced consequences.

Even menopausal women had menstruated again (although these were isolated cases).

The Spanish Agency for Medicines and Health Products (AEMPS) periodically submits reports on reported adverse events.

That is, any health problem that appears after receiving a vaccine, which may or may not be caused by it.

[Luxury Hotels and Prisons: Nearly $1 Billion in COVID-19 Aid Spent on Other Projects]

All these events are studied and analyzed to confirm if they are caused by the drug.

If so, they are included in the package insert and SmPC (known as an adverse reaction).

With the data available to date,

the hypothesis of a possible causal relationship between menstrual cycle disorders and vaccination could not be confirmed

, due to the lack of homogeneity in both symptoms and reporting periods.

Profuse bleeding resolved within months of vaccination

However, on February 23, 2022, the AEMPS published its latest report, echoing two recent studies that raise the possibility of an increase in the frequency of these alterations, with slight and transitory changes.


"The most important thing is to break barriers," says the Honduran scientist nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize

March 23, 202204:04

The Norwegian Institute of Public Health evaluated menstrual changes in 5,688 women between 18 and 30 years old through questionnaires sent to the mobile phones of the participants.

Although 37.8% had changes before vaccination, there was a significant increase in changes after the first injection (especially heavy bleeding).

In general, the disturbances were temporary and returned to normal two months later.

These variations did not affect the acceptance of the vaccine: 92.3% of women who reported changes after the first dose also received the second, compared to 94% of those who had not reported any changes.

Although the prevalence after the second dose was somewhat higher, two out of three women who presented alterations after the first dose experienced them again with the second.

This latest data is being evaluated and there are no definitive conclusions about its duration.

Delayed bleeding after vaccination

For its part, the National Institutes of Health of the United States studied the association between the length of the menstrual cycle and vaccination.

To do this, they analyzed data from 3,959 women between 18 and 45 years old collected through a mobile application.

The vaccinated group presented a small variation in the length of the cycle, which arrived one day later, but not in the duration of bleeding.

The delay was more noticeable in women who received the two doses during the same cycle (two days).

[Moderna claims its COVID-19 vaccine for children under 6 elicits a strong immune response]

In all groups the effect was transient and cycle lengths returned to normal two cycles after vaccination.

In Spain, the University of Granada launched the Eva Project.

In the first phase, more than 14,000 responses were collected: 70% claimed to have noticed changes after vaccination.

For these reasons, there is even more talk of a fourth dose of the vaccine against COVID-19

March 14, 202201:43

In addition, the University of Extremadura also carried out a questionnaire and obtained more than 17,500 participants, of which 50% had noticed some variation.

However, both works are not definitive and their results are still being studied.

Why do menstrual changes occur after a vaccine?

Before determining the causes, we must take into account that menstrual cycles are not always the same.

Although the average cycle is 28 days, the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics considers normal cycles between 24 and 38 days, as well as bleeding up to eight days.

The female reproductive system is regulated by hormonal interaction between the hypothalamus, pituitary gland, and ovaries.

This interaction is known as the HHG axis.

Stressors from daily life, the environment, and health (for example, very extreme diets, intense exercise, infections, or medications) can influence this system and disrupt the release of hormones.

Thus, menstrual changes can be due to various reasons.

In the case of vaccines, messenger RNA vaccines (Comirnaty-Pfizer and Spikevax-Moderna) produce a lot of immunological activity and create a very robust immune response.

This can be a stressful factor that causes transient disturbances.

There is little literature on the matter and studies are still lacking to ensure an association between both variables.

1,400 workers fired for refusing the COVID-19 vaccine in New York

Feb. 15, 202202:43

Unfortunately, menstruation is not usually a factor considered in clinical trials.

One of the reasons is that most studies, to prevent pregnancy from occurring during trials (with the risks that this entails), require women to take highly effective contraceptives, usually hormonal.

Therefore, it is very difficult to detect menstrual variations during the development of a drug, since its cycles are artificial.

Until now, many women have noticed variations in their cycles, even if they had previously had similar episodes regardless of their vaccination status, although all of them have been temporary and not very serious.

However, more time is needed to observe short-term and long-term phenomena in a larger population.

In this scenario,

the media and social networks have had a great impact

on the notification and visibility of these changes.

In addition, it is necessary to highlight the importance of the pharmacovigilance reports of the AEMPS.

They are essential to monitor the available data and detect new and relevant information on marketed drugs.

Anyone can report a suspected adverse drug reaction to the Spanish Pharmacovigilance System for Medicines for Human Use.

Vallivana Rodrigo Casares is a researcher in Clinical Trials in the Vaccine Research Area, at the Fisabio research institute, Spain.

Source: telemundo

All news articles on 2022-03-25

You may like

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.