The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Assassination of Samuel Paty: his family files a complaint against the public authorities for "non-prevention of crime"

2022-04-06T12:32:58.437Z


A complaint against X was filed Wednesday, April 6 in Paris. The family's lawyer, Me Virginie Le Roy, believes that "Samuel Paty could have been saved" and points to serious dysfunctions.


The family of Samuel Paty, a history and geography professor murdered by an Islamist terrorist on October 16, 2020, filed a complaint against X, Wednesday April 6 in Paris, for "

non-prevention of crime and non-assistance to anyone in danger

”, learned

Le Figaro

by the lawyer of the family, Me Virginie Le Roy, confirming information from

Liberation

.

Read alsoThe assassin of Samuel Paty glorified by his family

This complaint "

aims to bring to the attention of the Public Prosecutor of the facts and omissions which seem to characterize the offense of non-assistance to a person in danger with regard to several agents of the Ministry of the Interior and Ministry of National Education who had to know directly or indirectly about the situation of Samuel Paty

”, can we read in the 80-page document that we consulted.

Prior to this complaint, the family of Samuel Paty questioned the ministries concerned and asked them for the transmission of several information and documents, they did not obtain any response

”, also indicates the complaint.

A formal notice was sent to the two ministries on March 25.

I have always considered that Samuel Paty could have been saved and that this attack should not have taken place.

Me Virginie Le Roy, lawyer for the family of Samuel Paty

I have always considered that Samuel Paty could have been saved and that this attack should not have taken place

”, explains to

Figaro

Me Virginie Le Roy, the family lawyer.

It seems obvious to me that there have been serious malfunctions, at all levels, which are criminally qualifiable.

These questions about security vulnerabilities are legitimate.

We cannot have nothing to answer to bereaved families

, ”continues the lawyer.

The services of the Ministry of the Interior knew that his name was circulating on the internet, that the name of the college was circulating on social networks and that threats were coming to the college.

Why was he not placed under protection directly?

asks Me Virginie Le Roy.

Another argument put forward by the lawyer: the principal of the college asked twice, around October 12, 2020, that a mobile security team from the rectorate - trained to manage security crises in schools - be dispatched to square.

In vain.

We had time to do things.

He would have been taken away from college, that was enough

, ”concludes Me Virginie Le Roy.

Source: lefigaro

All news articles on 2022-04-06

You may like

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.