The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Inter-round debate: “The right words…”

2022-04-19T19:31:28.411Z


The editorial of Le Figaro, by Yves Thréard. The times have changed. In 1974, the two finalists for the presidential election, Valéry Giscard d'Estaing and François Mitterrand, disputed the "monopoly of the heart" of the French. Pretty formula which has also been claimed to have played into the hands of the first, winner that year. They each had their own vision of the country's future. It was then project against project. By voting, the vot


The times have changed.

In 1974, the two finalists for the presidential election, Valéry Giscard d'Estaing and François Mitterrand, disputed the

"monopoly of the heart"

of the French.

Pretty formula which has also been claimed to have played into the hands of the first, winner that year.

They each had their own vision of the country's future.

It was then project against project.

By voting, the voter adhered, more or less, to one or the other.

Almost fifty years later, the debate of their distant successors, this Wednesday evening, will not register at all in this "sentimental" register.

Emmanuel Macron and Marine Le Pen will rather seek to cause as little rejection as possible.

It will be “rejection against rejection”.

Admittedly, the two candidates also embody two Frances that everything opposes.

But the lack of love - not to say hatred - inspired by political leaders today is such that people vote more to block than out of conviction.

Even in the first round...

In these conditions…

This article is for subscribers only.

You have 56% left to discover.

Freedom is also to go to the end of a debate.

Keep reading your article for 1€ the first month

I ENJOY IT

Already subscribed?

Login

Source: lefigaro

All news articles on 2022-04-19

You may like

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.