The Alliance police union, classified on the right, on Wednesday April 27 judged "
inadmissible
" the decision of the examining magistrates to indict for "
intentional homicide
" the policeman who killed Sunday on the Pont-Neuf in Paris two men who would have forced a check.
To discover
LIVE - War in Ukraine: follow minute by minute the evolution of the conflict
YOUR COMMUNE - The results of the second round of the presidential election in your area
Read alsoInvestigation into the Brétigny accident: the forcing of the SNCF
"
At this stage of our information, Alliance cannot accept that our colleague is the victim of the judicial system which continues to remain a shadow of itself
", writes the union in a leaflet, denouncing a decision which comes "
to question our institution and our police officers
”.
Alliance, one of the main police unions among peacekeepers, had created controversy in May 2021 by declaring, through the voice of its secretary general Fabien Vanhemelryck during a rally in front of the National Assembly: "
the problem of the police, it is justice
”.
Meeting scheduled for Monday
Declaring itself "
for self-defense and the presumption of self-defense
", a measure defended by Marine Le Pen during her presidential campaign but rejected by re-elected President Emmanuel Macron, the organization calls for a rally on Monday at 12 p.m. at the "
Fontaine Saint -Michel, in front of the Court of Paris
”.
The 24-year-old peacekeeper, indicted for "
voluntary homicide
" on the driver, is also indicted for "
willful violence by a person holding public authority resulting in death without intention to give
it " acting from the front passenger and for “
willful violence aggravated by a person holding public authority
” against the rear passenger.
Read alsoBrétigny derailment: the double standard of the judicial investigation
The policeman was left free, under judicial control.
He is prohibited from leaving the territory " with some
exceptions
", from appearing in Paris, from coming into contact with the police department to which he belongs for six months, from exercising as a police officer involving contact with the public, from wearing weapons and contact with the victims.
He also has a duty of care.