The Court of Cassation rejected on Wednesday May 11 the appeals of the former minister Pierre Joxe and the former boss of the Equidia chain Eric Brion, now definitively dismissed from their lawsuits for defamation against the two women who accuse them of sexual violence .
To discover
LIVE - War in Ukraine: follow minute by minute the evolution of the conflict
Read alsoSexual violence: can we create a file of suspected persons?
In these two emblematic cases of the #Metoo wave of denunciation of sexual violence, the highest court of the judiciary considered that the court of appeal had been right to consider that the remarks of the two accusers were based "
on a factual basis sufficient
" to grant them "
the benefit of good faith
".
"Debate of general interest"
In its judgments, the Court adds that the offending remarks, which date from October 2017, did contribute to "
a debate of general interest on the denunciation of non-consensual behavior with a sexual connotation by certain men towards women
" .
.
The case involving Pierre Joxe began on October 18, 2017, three days after the launch of #Metoo, when Ariane Fornia, daughter of Eric Besson, former minister of Nicolas Sarkozy, published a post.
She claimed to have been the victim of sexual assault in her youth by a "
former minister of Mitterrand
".
The other case examined by the Court of Cassation broke out on October 13, 2017, when journalist Sandra Muller launched the hashtag #BalanceTonPorc on her Twitter account, calling on women to denounce those who had harassed them in the workplace.
Defamation
In the process, she had opened the ball of accusations by writing in a tweet: “
You have big breasts.
You are my type of woman.
I will make you cum all night long.
Eric Brion ex-boss of Equidia #BalanceTonPorc
”.
At first instance, the court ruled in favor of the two plaintiffs who considered themselves defamed by their accusers, ordering them to pay damages.
But the Paris Court of Appeal then overturned these judgments, on March 31 and April 14, 2021, considering that the denunciations fell under freedom of expression.
This decision of the Court of Cassation takes the opposite view of the position of the General Advocate of the Court of Cassation, who during the hearing, on April 5, had spoken in favor of the cassation of the two judgments.
Read alsoSexual violence: can we create a presumption of non-consent under the age of 15?
While recalling "
the importance of the fundamental freedom of expression
", Blandine Mallet-Bricout had called for preserving "
a balance (...) between this freedom and the protection of the individual rights of citizens
" and for "
insisting on the need
” to have “
elements of proof enabling the plausibility of the facts reported to be characterized
” in order to benefit from the exception of “
good faith
”.