The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Trump must pay $110,000 to have contempt order dropped

2022-05-11T18:42:15.019Z


In April, the former president was fined $10,000 a day for failing to appear before the New York prosecutor, who is investigating irregularities in his businesses.


Former President Donald Trump, on May 6 at a rally during the Republican primaries in Greensburg, Pennsylvania. HANNAH BEIER (REUTERS)

The tangled judicial battle of Donald Trump as a result of his pending cases in New York has taken a new turn this Wednesday.

The former president must pay a fine of $110,000 to the New York State Attorney's Office and satisfy other documentation requirements to avoid a contempt charge for failing to appear before the prosecutor, Letitia James, in the framework of a civil investigation. about alleged irregularities in his emporium.

Judge Arthur Engoron, who announced the amount of the fine on Wednesday, imposed a sanction of $10,000 a day on the former Republican president at the end of April as a sanction for his failure to appear.

In a virtual hearing held today, Engoron explained that the payment accountant stopped last Friday, when the tycoon and his lawyers presented new affidavits about the relevant documents that James had requested for the case.

Trump reiterated, as he did in April, that he does not own any relevant files, something that Engoron called surprising, given the size of his emporium and the volume of its business.

The judge has given Trump until May 20 to meet additional requirements, including the presentation of sworn statements from his personal assistant and other members of his team, as well as a report, commissioned from third parties, on the accounts of the Trump Organization, the name of the family emporium.

The contempt charge could be revived if Trump, currently the handyman in the Republican primary race, doesn't come forward with all that information on time.

Prosecutor James, with whom Trump maintains a tug of war not only judicially, but also politically -she has repeatedly denounced being the object of an ideological witch hunt by the Democratic prosecutor-, maintains that the investigation has found evidence that the The Trump Organization, a conglomerate that owns hotels, golf courses and other real estate around the world, provided misleading information to banks and the Treasury to obtain advantages and benefits in granting loans and obtaining tax exemptions.

Although at the moment neither the former president nor his children, also investigated, have been charged, these allegedly fraudulent practices cost the position of the financial director of the emporium, and Trump's right-hand man for decades, who surrendered to justice last spring and that many consider a scapegoat or firewall to protect the Trump core.

In January, prosecutor James called Ivanka and Donald Jr, the oldest children of the former president, to testify.

A few weeks earlier, at the end of December, the former president tried to stop the case with a lawsuit against James.

Far from being resolved, the process continues with advances and setbacks.

Among the first, the withdrawal of support from the audit magnate stands out, who for decades evaluated her business, ensuring that the accounts of the last ten years are not reliable.

In the chapter on setbacks - that is, small respites for the Republican - there is the resignation of two investigators who were instructing a criminal case, parallel to James' civil case, on alleged irregularities in the emporium.

The abandonment of the two lawyers occurred after the new Manhattan prosecutor, in charge of that criminal investigation, expressed doubts about the relevance of continuing with the case.

Subscribe here to the EL PAÍS América newsletter and receive all the key information on current affairs in the region.

Source: elparis

All news articles on 2022-05-11

You may like

News/Politics 2024-04-07T09:14:16.249Z
News/Politics 2024-04-07T17:36:49.038Z
News/Politics 2024-04-11T17:23:28.833Z

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.