The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

In the land of wild crops Israel today

2022-05-12T11:12:43.304Z


The best faculties will also study the fiasco of the Israeli State Attorney's Office Pilber: "I told investigators that I was in a meeting with Netanyahu and he said A, B, C. But I did not remember when it was." Adv. Ben Tzur: "And you came to the conclusion that there was a meeting on Monday or Tuesday and after that you acted and acted. But I showed that you do not meet with him. " Pilber: "From what you have shown, I did not meet with Netanyahu in the first week." Adv. Ben T


Pilber: "I told investigators that I was in a meeting with Netanyahu and he said A, B, C. But I did not remember when it was."

Adv. Ben Tzur: "And you came to the conclusion that there was a meeting on Monday or Tuesday and after that you acted and acted.

But I showed that you do not meet with him. "

Pilber: "From what you have shown, I did not meet with Netanyahu in the first week."

Adv. Ben Tzur: "Your memories are a story that was not and was not created."

Pilber: "Presenting facts, I can not argue. Everything according to assumptions. I was not sure about the dates. We did work."

Adv. Ben Tzur: "This is a job for which it is impossible to receive an outstanding employee award.

Because what's missing in it? "


Pilber:" Evidence. "

There is only one issue in each 4000 case that is not in dispute.

Even from the sharpest Netanyahu catalogs, the most devout RLBs (just not Bibi) will admit it. There is no golden evidence. The precedent case is circumstantial, and is based on state witnesses. The puzzle must be connected. What happened this week in the cross - examination of Shlomo (Momo) Pilber was beyond the scattering of the puzzle.

Be with me.

The prosecution's thesis was based on the fact that Netanyahu met Pilber after his appointment as director general of the Ministry of Communications and instructed him, according to the prosecution, to do well with Shaul Elowitz. Pilber was appointed director general of the Ministry of Communications on June 7, - June 14.

According to the prosecution and according to Pilber's testimony, the facilitation meeting was held during the week in question in the Prime Minister's Office in Jerusalem, and Pilber even added that the meeting was held in the evening.

Moreover, the prosecution focused the main investigation on possible dates for June 7-7, and Pilber insisted it could only have been on June 8 or June 9.

Adv. Boaz Ben-Zur, Netanyahu's lawyer, acted on two levels: one - to get Pilber to speak on the witness stand in real time - and in fact, until he signed a state witness agreement (we will mention that Pilber was interrogated by the Securities Authority and did not mention Netanyahu) - he did not at all think that Netanyahu instructed him to do good with Bezeq.

The significance of this fact is enormous - if Pilber did not think in real time that this was Netanyahu's directive, then all his actions after that meeting were not related to the directive, for the simple reason that the "directive" was not given!

Advocate Ben-Zur even showed a video where Pilber thinks he is not being filmed outside the interrogation room, where Pilber tells the interrogator, as Messiah according to Tomo, that he really does not remember such a prompting session. False: Between investigative exercises and a deliberate attempt to plant an incriminating version forever, even when he seeks to detail facts that are in conflict with suspicion.

Decent people,

left and right, should also be shocked by the fact that in the important investigation into the history of the State of Israel, above which is the sign "in fear and pity", there were those who made statements that could harm the chances of a prime minister's conviction.

error?

So many times she erred in defending the defense?

odd.

We will continue.

Until Wednesday the puzzle was in a dilapidated condition, but then it disintegrated into pieces.

On Wednesday, the golden vision arrived, the same evidence he proved through the Netanyahu and Pilber diaries - but also much, much more than that, through Pilber's own cell phone location.

Locations and interrogation of locations carried out by the police and the State Attorney's Office, only after the indictment has been filed.

And it's iron.

So what was there: On the 7th of the month, Pilber's phone rang around the Prime Minister's Office for half an hour.

Ben-Zur proved, through messages from Pilber's phone, that he was in a meeting with another person and not with Netanyahu at the same time, and Pilber confirmed this.


On the 8th of the month, hold on tight, Pilber in general celebrated at his niece's bat mitzvah in Gush Etzion.

On the 9th of the month he was in Tel Aviv all day.

Do not be surprised, but even on all the dates up to the meeting with Elowitz on the 14th of the month, it has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt that the meeting in question simply did not take place.

When did the meeting take place?

On the 15th of the month, after the meeting with Elowitz.

This is proven by diaries and WhatsApp correspondence.

It's proven.

But it just did not align with the thesis, and in fact the thesis collapses.

Because if Netanyahu did not instruct Pilber before meeting with Eli Kamir and Shaul Elowitz, then there was no and no facilitation meeting.

And if no facilitation meeting has taken place, there is no bribery.

And if there is no bribe, there is no portfolio.

The best law faculties in the world will also study the fiasco of the Israeli State Attorney's Office.

The precedent-setting and negligent indictment.

The unfounded thesis on the thresholds of facts and object evidence.

The Netanyahu trial is the Moby Dick of the State Attorney's Office.

The size of the target exposes the pursuers.

Session after session, we are exposed to the rough stitching, the crossing of boundaries and of course to the extent that the legal work was amateurish.

Record, they came to court and questioned Pilber for a preliminary investigation knowing they had no such meeting in the squares.

In 2018

, an acquaintance of a journalist told me that I was harming myself in my support of Netanyahu.

Damage to my reputation, due to the symbiosis created for me with Netanyahu's legal battle.

He did not understand two things: First, it was not Netanyahu the persona that stood before my eyes, but the truth that cries out from the country.

I was nailed to the job.

I could not escape to Nineveh.

The law enforcement system is of immense importance.

In their hands is the power.

Massive power.

What happens when that power is a power to corrupt?

Power to destroy life?

Who guards the guards?

Second, the damage the journalist talked about is among the left, especially the rabbis, not among a huge Jewish national public that very quickly realized that the cases are just a cover story. And the big story is an anti-democratic attack on the Zionist project. In the teeth of a progressive tsunami whose whole purpose is to bring about the end of the Jewish state.

The forceps movement becomes clear in full force: the progressive left used the public law enforcement system to overthrow the national camp and bring about the formation of a government to dismantle Zionism.

I may be a wild growth, but when I look in the mirror at my wrinkles, I know I'm on the right side of history. 

Were we wrong?

Fixed!

If you found an error in the article, we'll be happy for you to share it with us

Source: israelhayom

All news articles on 2022-05-12

You may like

News/Politics 2024-02-16T05:10:02.815Z
News/Politics 2024-02-16T05:12:47.519Z

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.