The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Pilber's investigation into the "facilitation meeting" continues; Netanyahu came to court again - Walla! news

2022-05-17T11:38:55.560Z


The defense continues to try and refute the "directive meeting" in the cross-examination of state witness Shlomo Pilber in the Alps trial. At the center of the discussion: The document in which the former director general of the Ministry of Communications described the meeting, in which, according to the indictment, Netanyahu instructed to do good with Bezeq and Elovich. Former Prime Minister to Walla !:


The Netanyahu trial

Pilber's investigation into the "facilitation meeting" continues;

Netanyahu came to court again

The defense continues to try and refute the "directive meeting" in the cross-examination of state witness Shlomo Pilber in the Alps trial.

At the center of the discussion: The document in which the former director general of the Ministry of Communications described the meeting, in which, according to the indictment, Netanyahu instructed to do good with Bezeq and Elovich. Former Prime Minister to Walla !:

Between Ashkenazi

17/05/2022

Tuesday, 17 May 2022, 12:44 Updated: 14:22

  • Share on Facebook

  • Share on WhatsApp

  • Share on Twitter

  • Share on Email

  • Share on general

  • Comments

    Comments

In the video: During the hearings on the "facilitation meeting" in case 4000: Netanyahu arrived at the court (Bini Ashkenazi)

The Jerusalem District Court this morning (Tuesday) continues the cross-examination of state witness Shlomo Pilber, former director general of the Ministry of Communications, by the defense attorney's defense attorney Benjamin Netanyahu, as part of the discussions on Case 4000. While the investigation continues to deal with the "facilitation meeting" Netanyahu arrived at the courtroom during the hearing, for the fourth day in a row. Asked Walla! He said, "I feel good.



" Supports the prosecution's thesis, and therefore she did not interrogate him for three years intentionally and not because she suddenly found him.

Prosecutor Tirosh dismissed the claim, saying the prosecution "denies this conspiracy."



During the interrogation, Adv. Ben-Zur sought to claim that while the indictment states that Netanyahu instructed Pilber ahead of the meeting with Elovich - the evidence indicates that it is the opposite, so to speak. The argument, the defense, is that Pilber's record in the same yellow block is not the product of a meeting with Netanyahu - but a product of the meeting between Pilber and Alovich.

More on Walla!

For a long time he did not stand on the witness stand until such an unreliable state: on the phenomenon of Solomon Pilber

To the full article

More on Walla!

  • Pilber after the request to amend the indictment: I did not invent, remember that the "directive" meeting took place

  • After Pilber's cross-examination: The prosecution sought to amend the indictment in the 4000 case

  • Netanyahu trial: How in the bribery case against the Prime Minister, no basic tests were conducted in real time?

  • Do not compromise on unsatisfactory sex: this will improve performance - with an exclusive discount

Netanyahu in the Jerusalem District Court, today (Photo: Flash 90, Olivia Fitoussi)

In recent days, the defense team has been trying to refute the "facilitation meeting."

According to the indictment, after the government approved Pilber's appointment as director general of the Ministry of Communications, he met with Netanyahu in the Prime Minister's Office to discuss Ministry of Communications matters, and during the meeting Netanyahu instructed him to do better with Bezeq and Elowitz. Eli Kamir and Elowitz



Last week, the defense proved that the meeting did not take place the week after the appointment was approved, since Pilber's cellphone locations showed that he was not in the prime minister's office that week, and the meeting has no record in the prime minister's diary or media minister's diary.



Yesterday, Adv. Ben-Zur dealt with Pilber's versions of the interrogations, claiming that he told Elowitz and Kamir that he met with Netanyahu, while they denied that he referred to Netanyahu in their meetings. , And what she thought, but Pilber gave them contradictory answers.However, he continued to insist that the facilitation meeting took place and that he remembers it well, and if there are discrepancies as to the date of the meeting - he is not the one to bridge it.

  • news

  • News in Israel

  • Criminal news and law

Tags

  • Benjamin Netanyahu

  • Shlomo Pilber

Source: walla

All news articles on 2022-05-17

You may like

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.