Once again the judge turned himself into a story in the Zadorov trial: the protocol that gives a terrifying glimpse of what happened in the courtroom

Judge Cola wrote in his decision that "the protocol speaks for itself."

It's really good that the protocol has arrived so that we can examine what is detailed in it.

Not only does it contradict her voice's decisions, it reveals a hallucinatory debate that is hard to believe took place in a judge's courtroom in Israel.

This puzzling protocol needs to be studied in advanced training

Welcome read

19/05/2022

Thursday, 19 May 2022, 13:55 Updated: 17:38

• Share on Facebook

• Share on WhatsApp

• Share on Twitter

• Share on Email

• Share on general

• Comments

  Comments

For days the public interested in vigilance waited, the curious judges, embarrassed prosecutors, and stunned private lawyers, waiting for Judge Asher Kola, the head of the panel at the retrial of Roman Zadorov.

They waited for him to close the two mysterious and dramatic circles he opened at a hearing in his courtroom on April 26.

In the same hearing, the behavior of the prosecutors' representatives was not new, but then he surprised and demanded that, in a precedent-setting and unfamiliar procedure, they choose one of the two: either ask for his dismissal, or express public confidence in him - otherwise he would make a "dramatic decision."

The second mysterious circle he opened was when he scattered in the same discussion frightening statements in the space of the courtroom, from which it was possible to understand - or rather could not have been understood otherwise, that external factors put pressure on him around the Zadorov trial.

In view of the puzzling things, the State Attorney, Amit Eisman, and the Northern District Attorney, Ilana Yerushalmi, demanded that he stop the trial until he clarified what exactly he meant when he spoke of those external pressures.

Regarding the requirement of the declaration of allegiance - they replied that they do not recognize such a procedure, neither in criminal procedure nor at all.

Her voice refused the request and continued the discussions.

Eisman and Yerushalmi's opinion did not rest and they asked the judge again for clarifications regarding the same pressures, since otherwise, above any verdict he receives, whatever it is, a cloud will hover.

More on Walla!

For a long time he did not stand on the witness stand until such an unreliable state: on the phenomenon of Solomon Pilber

To the full article

More on the Zadorov trial

• The judge in the Zadorov trial decided to add a toothpick to the fire, and let the conspiracies penetrate the court

• Zdorov trial - the prosecutor's office blabbered on in Kugel Square and failed the test

• The smart test that detects an increased risk of having a stroke is currently in operation

"Dramatic decision."

Cola (Photo: Flash 90, David Cohen)

Last Sunday, the judge issued a brief decision, in which he wrote: "For the avoidance of doubt, I would like to clarify that I did not attribute to any factor 'illegal acts', just as I did not attribute to 'unknown factors' the use of improper pressure.

"Well, it's really good that the protocol has finally arrived, so we can check what's detailed in it. And what's in it, not only contradicts what ' The latter in the judge's courtroom.

Well, at the end of an exhausting day of hearings, in which the blood stain expert, Paul Kisch, appeared, Judge Cola opened the saga with the following: "Since I feel the prosecution staff do not trust me, then I may make a dramatic decision in this case."

boom.

The threat was laid at once in the hall.

. , Judge Cola declared.

Let's unpack this sentence for a second: "Time and time again insults are hurled at me."

If we were dealing with a kindergarten, let him prove, where are the insults?

He will refer to the day and page in the minutes, because in all the hearings in which I was present at this trial, and I was present at quite a few of these, I did not see and hear insults from the prosecution towards the judge, but I certainly saw the opposite insults.

The attorneys were certainly outraged when her voice put words in the witness' mouth, I heard those words from her voice in my own ears.

If they had not revolted in the hall over these words, they would have been raised in office, but fulfilled, we will continue, we are not even in the appetizer of this disturbed debate.

Where are the insults?

Zdorov (Photo: Eli Ashkenazi)

At this point the judge presented a choice to the State Attorney's Office: "Therefore, either, either you file such a request (meaning a request for disqualification, BK), or you give another notice (as stated the State Attorney's Office understood that the judge's intention is a public expression of trust in it, BK) The judge blew the whistle again: "If not, then expect a dramatic announcement." Fear Gd. Then the judge moved on to the story of the "campaign" against him: "K) Fingerprints of one person or another."

Wait, wait, stop.

As I have mentioned before, the judge is primarily referring to the critical publications of the Knesset in News 13 and here in Walla, which, as I recall, angered the judge, who unprecedentedly decided to talk about them with the prosecutor's spokesman, Noam Sharvit.

The judge, your reading eyes, hints in the courtroom that those publications are the result of a "campaign" by the prosecution against him, as he recognizes "fingerprints."

How sad that this judge is discussing a case that deals so much with such and such "imprints."

If this is through drawing his conclusions and determining the factual findings, woe to us, no matter whether he is convicted or acquitted.

Since in this case, naturally, I know the facts better than the judge, I hold that no one from the prosecution asked me to come to the hearings.

I came, because the sentence interested me, because it is important, because I read its protocols.

And when I arrived, I saw and listened, I was just amazed, and I started publishing what my eyes see and read and hear my ears.

The claim that these publications are the result of a "campaign" is nothing less than spreading a conspiratorial lie from his honor customs.

Unfortunately there is no other way to describe the words of the unsubstantiated judge.

Hence the debate - which is part of a murder case, yes ?, is just diving into the realms of psychedelic delusion.

"Expect a dramatic announcement."

Zdorov (Photo: Eli Ashkenazi)

"I'm an old enough judge," the judge said of himself, "experienced enough, but also human, and when I feel what's blowing from you, for a long time, you can say that about me, you can say otherwise, a thousand and one things can be said about me, say about me "That I came with a prejudice, a biased opinion ... that I have no integrity ... it's something I can not agree with, even if the price I have to pay will be a heavy personal price, and even if this case goes where it will go, but I do not know."

At one point, Advocate Yarom Halevi, the defense attorney, asked for permission to speak and told Judge Cola, if he missed, how he came to his defense against the MK following one of his publications.

"I was angry at the same reporter and also shouted at him here at the hearing and before the hearing of course," Halevy boasted, "because it really was scandalous for me."

Yes, in the context of this delusional hearing, the defense counsel seeks to obtain points from the judge for his standing before the evil reporter.

At this point he began to plead with the judge not to retire: "If his honorable retire because he can not withstand the pressure, they (the prosecution, BK) are champions." Think about the situation. At first the judge turns himself into a story, If he has the hug and the defense, it is the defense attorney who is defending the defendant, who the judge must decide on the question of whether he did indeed murder Tair Rada. What is sad is that it only got worse. Please stay with me, even if it is not easy.

"I have nothing to do with the media," Judge Cola Lirom Halevi says, as the two talk about the reprimanded representatives of the State Attorney's Office by their side.

"True with the prosecution," Halevy reinforces, and the judge continues: "In violation of the law, not a violation of the law," he wonders aloud and raises the clear possibility - contrary to what he wrote in his decision, that the prosecution violated the law.

Halevy is anxious about what the judge intends to do.

"So what," he asks, "so I do not know," Judge Cola replies.

Alas, what will happen to the behavior of these bad lawyers, Judge Cola and Halevi wonder together.

Just so you understand the intensity of the joke: Halevy, regularly, acts in the hall as if he were his home living room, slaps his colleagues in the face, speaks and shouts whenever he wants, including his disturbing and memorable performance during AK's testimony, which due to its existence behind closed doors About him, and all this without the court arresting him, except here and there half-amused remarks.

Wrote the truth ?.

Zdorov and Yarom Halevi (Photo: Eli Ashkenazi)

Let us return to our discussion: Halevy expresses to the judge his apprehension of what will happen if he disqualifies himself:

His honor will think of a defendant, what kind of torture he has. "Halevy is right in this argument as a defense attorney. Who can put his hand on his heart, and say that this court hearing, in a murder case, is a logical hearing? It's not over. Sitting, silent like a fish, no one denies it. "

"We have not yet been able to get up and put in a word, sir," responds prosecutor Sharon Har Zion. "I want to expose them all now. Those who need to know know. Those who do not need to know do not know, that they were done here in a way that in my opinion should not be done in a reformed country."

Now read again Judge Cola's latest decision, which appears at the beginning of the article, that he did not talk about mysterious and illegal pressures at all, and ask yourself if he wrote the truth?

It is a fact that Halevy also understood things just like the State Attorney's Office.

"His Excellency says there are things we do not know," Halevy responds with understandable anxiety, "I have always been afraid of things that are not legal and it is horrible and terrible. "I have no idea who turned to him and who dared to say things in his honor. Maybe from the system. It's now my imagination, and I do not ask for a response. From the system, do not do this, do this, these are terrible things. Do not give up, I can say in his honor."

"Expresses his fears to the judge", Halevi (Photo: Eli Ashkenazi)

Her voice not only does not dispel Halevi's concerns, but responds to him in the following simple way: "Thank you very much, Attorney Halevi."

The non-denial is like approving the conspiracies that the judge scattered in the courtroom.

Excited Halevy replies to the judge: "I did not imagine that I would make such an unusual speech. I swore, I swore, my wife sits next to me, I also knew they would kill me, I would continue this case to the end. I do not care, even if I know I will be murdered. "If information came to me that they were going to murder me, I would continue to try to win the affair, and if I talk like that to his honor, then his honor will not leave the judgment seat and will continue according to the evidence."

If so, the defense attorney follows the judge's hints, already talking about potential murders, and the judge instead of stopping it, continues the disturbed hearing.

Just to mention, so far the prosecution has not said a word.

further.

"I will address briefly," prosecutor Meital Chen Rosenfeld tries her luck.

"Do you want to respond to something? You do not have to," the offended judge says, "I want to say that we respect the court even if sometimes it looks different. I guess there is reciprocity. "At the same time, I think your honor knows that our opinion is not comfortable with the way things are sometimes conducted in this procedure and I do not expand. We have always said everything to the protocol."

"I would go on trying to win an affair," Halevy (Photo: Reuven Castro)

"Second second," Judge Cola erupts, "these are two different things. That the way is not right, what you say, I can accept it, I can understand. I have already told you a thousand times, I am not Sister Theresa. Whoever knows me, knows me ".

This too is an inconceivable sentence.

The judge admits that he is conducting a trial in an inappropriate way?

And another sentence like that is sensitive?

As an insurance certificate, the judge pulls out the following argument: "When I have to attack the defense, I attack the defense."

And I ask, my God, why attack anyone at all?

The Israeli legal system is very simple.

Each side brings witnesses, raises arguments, the judges have to decide.

How did we get to the raids?

At this point the judge filters a note to the courtroom about his Passover experiences: "As a human being, I did not have Passover, I did not have a holiday, I did not have a holiday, I did not have a holiday."

Once again the judge turned himself into a story in Roman Zadorov's trial.

Mila would have ransacked the hint bills he had scattered.

Spoiler, they will not be repaid even later in the discussion.

"We heard harsh things from his honor," prosecutor Chen Rosenfeld replies to the judge.

"When," Judge Cola asked, "a few months ago, exactly a few months ago," Mount Zion replied, "then I will show you this sir in the minutes, I am ashamed of the country I represent for 23 years, I am ashamed of the country I represent, I will see." .

What bothers the judge at that moment, in the words of Mount Zion, is in general a reference to him by mistake in the second person: "'Show me,' do you understand? You are talking to me in the second person."

Needless to say, the judge really needs to address a third person, but let's agree that of all the things that are happening in the courtroom at the moment, Mount Zion's utterance is the least disturbing.

His Excellency conducts a hallucinatory, disrespectful, embarrassing, childish, unprecedented criminal procedure and trial in general, in which he blows up conspiracies and asks for a declaration of allegiance from the plaintiffs, and what bothers him is that when the plaintiff responds to her feelings, she mistakenly addresses her in the second person.

is funny.

"I am right that you do not trust me", Zadorov's retrial (Photo: Eli Ashkenazi)

Mount Zion, which only recently completed a glorious representation of the state in its flagship case 512 against criminal organizations, adds: "Am I ashamed of the state I represent? A threatened attorney, who conducts cases against criminal organizations, I shame the state I represent"?

And oops, it came out to her again: "And I will show you (the quotes, in the Qur'an) sir." The judge remembers, but the prosecutor remembers differently: "No sir, really no, not really on the same day", "really yes", the judge insists. Wonderful. Learned.

After these things, Judge Cola concludes with disappointment: "One hundred percent, so I'm right you have no faith in me, why do you say you respect me? Tell the truth, there is no truth."

Towards the end of this fantastic event, the plaintiff tries to sharpen with the judge the issue of hints of illegal acts: "Sir hinted here at things being done illegally, it is very difficult to hear," Har Zion wonders.

"Not towards you, not towards you," her voice reassures her.

In other words, the judge does not correct Har Zion's statement that he meant illegal acts.

He simply said that these were not acts of the State Attorney's Office, in contrast to what he wrote in his decision on Sunday, according to which he did not claim that there were any illegal acts.

Yes, it's probably hard to get down from imaginary trees.

There is no way to summarize this long article, other than to write that this protocol should be taught in advanced training judges.

This.

• news

• Opinions and interpretations

Tags

• Roman Zdorov

• Protocols

• Judges