The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

"The request to amend the indictment in the 4000 case is unfounded" Israel today

2022-05-22T13:58:44.677Z


The couple opposes the prosecution's request to change the date of the Netanyahu-Pilber meeting indicated in the indictment.


The Elowitz couple oppose the prosecution's request to change the date of the meeting indicated in the indictment against Netanyahu in case 4000. According to the request submitted to the court about a week ago, the section regarding the date of the Netanyahu-Pilber meeting should be amended, in which Netanyahu allegedly instructed Pilber The meeting included in the indictment for "at an unknown date, after defendant Netanyahu decided on Pilber's appointment."

That is, after Netanyahu decided on the appointment and not after he actually appointed him.

According to the petitioners, this amendment is required for the purpose of a comprehensive examination of the chain of evidence in the context of the date on which the guidance meeting was held and for reasons of arriving at the investigation of the truth.

The amendment was raised after Netanyahu's defense attorney, Adv. Boaz Ben-Zur, proved through Netanyahu's meeting diary, correspondence from Pilber's cell phone and his cell phone icons that the said meeting could not take place a week after Pilber's appointment.

Advocate Jacques Chen, representing the Elowitz couple, responded in court to the prosecution's request to amend the indictment and asked to reject the request: "

Jacques Cohen on the request: "In a very unusual course that is not remembered like it", Photo: Oren Ben Hakon

"This is a very unusual move that is not remembered as such. It is no coincidence that requests to amend an indictment are filed after a new evidentiary database has been established, and not in the midst of a cross-examination," Chen explained in a statement.

"The accuser failed to prove a substantive claim in the indictment. This claim was refuted in the cross-examination. This is the real reason that led her to file an unfounded and unfounded motion."

In a hearing on Wednesday about two weeks ago, Netanyahu's defense attorney Adv. Boaz Ben Tzur continued to undermine the credibility of the directive meeting, which forms the basis of the indictment in the 4000 case, in a spectacular legal show. Says on June 7 or 8, 2015, could not have taken place before the 15th of that month, that is, in the second week of the job. .

Were we wrong?

Fixed!

If you found an error in the article, we'll be happy for you to share it with us

Source: israelhayom

All news articles on 2022-05-22

You may like

Trends 24h

News/Politics 2024-03-27T16:45:54.081Z

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.