Scientists who twerk like Chanel

The tweet from @angelasororidad is devastating.

“Those of us who believe that a song that invites people to prostitute themselves by showing their asses are not moralists, we know that the image and the message are not innocent, now we have these vomit lyrics on all the stations and the girls want to be Chanel and not investigators, let's go! ”.

As expected, things get a bit tense with the message, which voluntarily or not ends in a nice couplet: 6,442 quotes, 878 likes, 211 retweets and a gazillion comments.

This time the network is united, but for worse: all against Ángela.

There are those who say that the author has little feminist (as defined).

“Sorority, she says… And she almost burned it.

Puritanism is not feminism, ”she reproaches him @ Rossend7.

Also those that remind you that we are not (only) what we hear.

“I grew up watching Madonna dancing sensually and bragging about being a material woman.

I saw Alaska swearing that she would do it again (kill out of jealousy).

And I joked with the choreography of the Mamachicho thousands of times.

I did not aspire to be materialistic, murder or prostitute myself,” she writes @ladycrocs.

Some sincerely admit that they would kill for a piece of Chanel's meat: “Well, obviously I want to be Chanel.

Have you seen the legs that she has? ”, tweets @godsavelidia.

Those of us who believe that a song that invites people to prostitute themselves by showing their asses are not moralists, we know that the image and the message are not innocent, now we have these vomit lyrics on all the stations and the girls want to be Chanel and not investigators, let's go!

pic.twitter.com/QWcjI3fe8i

– Angela Escribano Mar (@Angelasororidad) May 15, 2022

Of all of them, I prefer the

.

“If you organize yourself well, you can be promiscuous and scientific.

There is time for everything”, says @thertuga_.

Also in favor of @quantumfracture, with more than 300,000 followers: “

: we scientists twerk to the ground”.

I confirm that I have seen prestigious editors, editors-in-chief, correspondents and even deputy directors of this newspaper twerking with insulting ease.

The philologist @arualhelike goes further: “I usually do research on songs that I like and also, if I can, I show my ass.

A kiss".

@antoniignasi puts the finger on the sore spot: “You have very much romanticized being a researcher when really the living conditions of a researcher are rubbish.

Me doing 25 hours at the Burger earned more than the doctorates with which I did internships”.

And a man by the name of @peixitu_m finishes it off: "The way science is in this country, it's better that girls don't want to be researchers."

Not even waitresses, I think, in the other heated debate these days on the social network, almost about Elon Musk.

EL PAÍS recounted the complaint of the hoteliers on the Costa Brava because there are no waiters.

They detected a lack of interest in the profession.

The tweet from the @el_pais account with the link to the information also united the hordes of

for a few hours.

The controversy can be summed up as follows: if you want waiters, hire them with decent working conditions.

But there is no need to suffer, the girls now want to be Chanel, according to Angela, and not researchers or waitresses.

They could also aspire to become Rihanna.

Or Beyonce.

Or Jennifer Lopez.

Or Rosalia.

Or Shakira.

Or Dua Lipa.

They all sing, dance, are beautiful, set trends, are groundbreaking, cheeky... They all win a dough.

They all show their asses when they feel like it.

Is the thing a bit reifying sometimes?

Maybe yes, why deny it?

But they do what they want.

Or so it seems.