The Shenzhen Bentley female incident continued to spread. On June 7, the Shenzhen State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission concluded that "Zhang Xiaozhong (the male protagonist of the incident, secretary of the Disciplinary Committee of Shenzhen Zhenye Group) did not register his marriage after his divorce in 2017." Moreover, "After verification by the special work class, it has not been found that Shenzhen Zhenye (Group) Co., Ltd. has economic ties and business dealings with Zhang Moumou (female) and the enterprises under his name."
Hu Xijin, the former editor-in-chief of the Global Times, who has retired but is still a traffic star in the mainland public opinion field, also immediately posted that "the Bentley girl incident is basically clear: this is an ordinary parking space dispute."
Hu Xijin also said, "We don't agree with endless questioning around a focused incident. We need to believe in the seriousness of the Shenzhen State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission's investigation and report, and they will be responsible for protecting public assets. In addition, no matter who, there are some people who should not be disturbed. Individual rights. There are very clear regulations on the boundaries between individual rights and public power, and the organization will supervise the implementation. After so many years of anti-corruption, breaking through such boundaries is by no means as easy as some people think.”
This article has absolutely no meaning to question the conclusion of Shenzhen SASAC, nor does it have any original intention to fight against Lao Hu at all. I just want to remind Lao Hu of two points:
First, don't forget to pat your chest last year to ensure that Zhengzhou will not conceal the death toll of torrential rain and Fengxian's embarrassing lesson in handling the chain girl incident.
We believe in the country and the government, but for a specific case or person, it is more reliable to rely on facts and evidence.
When there are still doubts about the matter, I jump to conclusions and promise everyone that if I shoot too much, I will not only lose faith in others, but also damage the credibility of the government, forming the so-called "Tacitus trap".
Second, Hu Xijin's point of view that "there are some personal rights that should not be disturbed. There are very clear regulations on the boundaries between personal rights and public power" is very important. What Chinese society needs most is to set more for ordinary people. Such rigid protective boundaries, frankly speaking, are too few and too fragile for ordinary people.
But the premise that Hu Xijin said "no matter who" is not necessarily correct.
Of course, this should be the case for ordinary people, but for public officials like Zhang Xiaozhong, who have huge resources in state-owned enterprises, especially when it comes to issues such as possible corruption and transfer of interests, they must accept a more comprehensive There should not be any monitoring blind spots constituted by the so-called "individual rights protection".
Shenzhen Bentley Gate Incident｜Secretary of the State-owned Enterprise: The Secretary is divorced and the party in the parking space is suspected of being his girlfriend.
The video goes viral | Shenzhen woman threatened to open 50 Bentley Pa parking spaces and revealed that her husband was the secretary of a state-owned enterprise
It’s not that we have extremely strict requirements for public officials. In fact, in any mature country, the boundaries of individual rights of national public officials and public officials who hold state assets or public resources are different from those of ordinary people, and they must accept a more comprehensive, stricter supervision.
There is no "paparazzi" culture in the mainland, and it is not allowed to exist in reality. This requires the government to have a more complete self-supervision system and stricter supervision requirements for public officials and quasi-public officials. The field of delivery must be placed under sunlight and supervision, and there should be no "individual right not to be disturbed" at all.
Specific to the Shenzhen Bentley female incident, it is very likely that the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission said that the notification that the two had not registered their marriage was accurate, but the whole process of overturning the whole process from fermentation to prolongation of the burn has at least the following three questions, and further steps are needed. clarify.
The first question is that on the evening of June 5, a statement on the situation of Zhenye Group came out on the Internet, saying that "Comrade Zhang Xiaozhong has no vehicle in his name, and the vehicle was borrowed from a friend for temporary use by Comrade Zhang Xiaozhong's lover. Zhang Xiaozhong The comrade is usually busy with work and neglects the construction of his family style, causing his spouse to make inappropriate remarks when he is agitated, causing adverse effects. The company's party committee has ordered him to make an in-depth review."
According to the "Daily Economic News" report, the statement was later denied by the staff of Zhenye Group, saying that it did not come from the company, but so far, Zhenye Group has not made a sound on the matter.
So who made this "rumour"?
Is it a "rumor"?
For the mainland public security system, it is very easy to find out the source with the current network traceability method. If the relevant individual or unit thinks it is fake, they can report the case to the public security organ to investigate, find out the source, and punish the rumor-monger. This can better wash away the grievances the secretary may suffer.
Hu Xijin commented on the Shenzhen Bentley Gate incident.
(Photo by Hong Kong 01 reporter)
The second question is, in the previous news, the woman involved has always been surnamed "Ouyang", why is "Zhang Moumou" (female) appearing in the Shenzhen SASAC's notification.
Is this "Ouyang" the same person as "Zhang Moumou"?
If so, why do different surnames appear one after the other?
If not, what is the relationship between the two?
The third question is that the Shenzhen State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission concluded that "Zhang Xiaozhong did not register his marriage after his divorce in 2017." However, many photos and videos of Zhang Xiaozhong's marriage with the girl involved have been circulated on the Internet in the past two days. doubt.
So, what is the relationship between the two?
Even if the two are in love and have not registered their marriage yet, considering their special relationship and the state-owned enterprise resources held by Secretary Zhang, do the two constitute "specially related persons"?
If it can constitute a "specific related person", anyone who knows the Mainland's public security economic investigation, discipline inspection commission or procuratorate's anti-corruption system will know that the transfer of benefits in such a situation is often carefully designed to evade investigation and is very secretive , Even if it is a professional judicial investigation, it often takes time to investigate. Shenzhen SASAC can come to the conclusion of the investigation in just one or two days. Is it a bit too hasty?
Of course, the Shenzhen State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission said at the same time that "if there are other problems in Zhang Xiaozhong in the follow-up, it will continue to be dealt with in accordance with laws and regulations, and will be announced to the public." past.
