This is therefore a
"historic trial"
: debates that are too long to dissect the terrorist crimes of November 13, 2015. But also a session of the specially composed Paris Assize Court where everyone played their role so well that the parties listened to each other.
And, as long as it has been measured accurately, respected.
At the time of the balance sheet, we will forget the tunnels of superfluous talking like the performances of "great witnesses" who had already said everything in the media and focus on self-justification (former President Hollande, delighted to be there , on your mind) ;
or depositions riddled with incongruities from Belgian investigators which one wonders by what prodigy they succeeded in obtaining the assistance of the police;
or conferences on terrorism given by scholars disconnected from the case, but convinced of their intellectual superiority, which gave the trial the appearance of a symposium.
Read also
Attacks of November 13: feigned apologies or sincere regrets, the last words of the accused
It all started on Wednesday, September 8, 2021 afternoon, three quarters of an hour late...
This article is for subscribers only.
You have 93% left to discover.
Cultivating your freedom is cultivating your curiosity.
Subscription without commitment
€0.99 THE FIRST MONTH
Already subscribed?
Login