The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Pierre-Henri Tavoillot: "How does damaging a painting contribute to solving the climate crisis?"

2022-07-11T17:31:38.648Z


INTERVIEW – In recent weeks, environmental activists have stepped up shock actions against famous works of art. For the philosopher, these methods are symptomatic of a jaded era which passively observes the action of militants who no longer exist except through excess.


Pierre-Henri Tavoillot is president of the College of Philosophy.

He has notably published

Will the war of generations take place?

with Serge Guérin, at Calmann-Lévy.

FIGAROVOX.

- In recent weeks, environmental activists have multiplied “shock” actions in museums: the “crusted” Mona Lisa on May 29;

hands glued to the frame of a painting by Turner;

a painting by John Constable overlaid with a landscape mined by fossil fuels at the

National Gallery

in London.

Why do environmental activists attack works of art?

Pierre-Henri TAVOILLOT.

-

First there is a strategy of “permanent brilliance”.

It characterizes all the activists who defend causes, whatever they are, in the age of buzz and social networks.

Because, at a lower cost, it is easy to make a move, instead of the thankless work of information and pedagogy which risks encountering unfortunate contradictory arguments.

A communication campaign is much more effective…

This article is for subscribers only.

You have 88% left to discover.

Freedom is also to go to the end of a debate.

Keep reading your article for €0.99 for the first month

I ENJOY IT

Already subscribed?

Login

Source: lefigaro

All news articles on 2022-07-11

You may like

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.