The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

The state in response to the High Court: "Five-year law to evacuate" | Israel Hayom

2022-08-10T17:26:33.998Z


However, it was reported that no eviction date will be specified and the court is requested to impose such a date • This is due to the security sensitivity involved • The "Yesh Din" organization petitioned the court: "The state continues to drag its feet"


The state submitted today (Wednesday) its position regarding the question of the evacuation of Chumash.

In its center, the state claims that it does not specify the date for the evacuation of the locality whose residents were deported as part of the disengagement plan, due to the security sensitivity of the matter and asks the High Court not to impose an evacuation date on it. At the same time, it clarified that "the outpost has the right to evacuate."

In their answer to the High Court, the state clarified that the attack, in which Yehuda Dimantman was murdered, "had a dramatic effect on the situation on the ground and the assessment of the security situation in the area of ​​the evacuated settlement of Chomash." The Israelis.

"The security forces are actively working to prevent Israelis from entering the area, in accordance with the directive of the political echelon. In general, barriers have been placed on the main access roads to the Five Points by means of vehicles. At the barriers manned by the security forces, the passage of only Palestinians is allowed and also - until the evacuation of All of the building components that were erected at the site - of a small group of Israelis associated with the yeshiva operating at the site. In addition, on several occasions, several members of the Knesset arrived at the site."

The state also added that in their position "the place should be evacuated. Accordingly, the respondents said that according to the discretion given to them and the authorized parties in the matter, including the position of the Minister of Defense, determined enforcement actions are carried out against any new construction or disorder in the Hamsh area. Moreover, In view of the repeated attempts to erect an illegal construction at the site and the incidents of violence in the sector, the presence of the security forces was increased for the purpose of control and enforcement at the site."

At the same time, they stated that due to the sensitivity and complexity, there is no room for the High Court's intervention in the question of whether the place will be evacuated. The building components located at the site - have been determined and will be determined from time to time according to the discretion given to the respondents and the authorities authorized in the matter, including in accordance with current situation assessments which the Minister of Defense maintains on an ongoing basis.

Yesh Din, the petitioning organization to the court, stated that: "The state continues to drag its feet and refuses to fulfill its legal and moral duty and the outpost that was illegally established on private lands of the residents of the village of Burka is vacant.

The dispossession of the Palestinians and the robbery of their lands must end - every day that passes intensifies the injustice and gives a reward to the criminals.

The Minister of Defense and the Prime Minister, like their predecessors, prove that the rule of law has always retreated in the face of political interests and the satisfaction of the settlers.

The Supreme Court must put them back on track through an explicit judicial determination that expresses displeasure with this conduct, which is all violations of the law and violation of Palestinian rights."

were we wrong

We will fix it!

If you found an error in the article, we would appreciate it if you shared it with us

Source: israelhayom

All news articles on 2022-08-10

You may like

Trends 24h

News/Politics 2024-03-28T06:04:53.137Z

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.