Amnesty recently launched a new product line ("merchandise") under the title "End Israeli Apartheid".
The products in the campaign, photo: Amnesty
In a tweet published by Christian Benedict, Amnesty's campaign manager who operates from the organization's headquarters in London, it is written: "We have launched new Amnesty UK t-shirts, information leaflets and other products to support the global campaign to end Israeli apartheid."
The tweet was accompanied by a photo showing shirts in different colors with the inscription "End Israeli Apartheid", alongside stickers and posters with the inscription, and an information leaflet distributed by the organization under the title "Israel's apartheid against the Palestinians - a crime against humanity".
Recently, a scathing report by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs was published, which stated that Amnesty has become "a major generator of delegitimization in the apartheid discourse that is conducted against the State of Israel."
According to the report, the organization "serves as a vehicle for accusing Israel of being an apartheid state and is a 'source of authority'".
Emanuel Nachshon, Deputy Director of Public Diplomacy and spokesman for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, added that "Amnesty is proving to be one of the most hostile organizations to Israel in the world, a real enemy along with Iran, Hezbollah and other haters of Israel."
20 years of defamation
Gerald Steinberg, founder and president of NGO Monitor, told Israel Hayom in response to the launch of the product line: "For 20 years, Amnesty has been running a discrediting campaign on everything related to Israel. Their reports are not reliable, and the organization's leaders have a personal agenda that combines extreme left for antisemitism".
A source close to the activities of the Amnesty organization in Israel stated that "it seems that the products belong to the British branch, which promotes the apartheid campaign as a whole. The Israeli branch, which operates separately, deals with the issue of apartheid exclusively in the 'occupied territories'."
were we wrong
We will fix it!
If you found an error in the article, we would appreciate it if you shared it with us