The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Water wars: "The injunction to share"

2022-08-18T17:48:56.971Z


The editorial of Le Figaro, by Philippe Gélie. Since the dawn of time, man has fought for water as much as for land, aware that one without the other is not worth much. The domination of the Roman Empire was reinforced by its science of aqueducts; in the 15th century, the peasants of the Swiss Valais killed each other for the control of the mountain torrents; in 1503, Leonardo da Vinci conspired with Machiavelli to divert the Arno from Pisa to


Since the dawn of time, man has fought for water as much as for land, aware that one without the other is not worth much.

The domination of the Roman Empire was reinforced by its science of aqueducts;

in the 15th century, the peasants of the Swiss Valais killed each other for the control of the mountain torrents;

in 1503, Leonardo da Vinci conspired with Machiavelli to divert the Arno from Pisa to the benefit of Florence;

and water was not the least issue in the Six-Day War in 1967 between Israel and its Arab neighbours.

For several decades now, experts and UN reports have announced the

"water wars of the 21st century".

This vital resource, a natural benefit par excellence, can become a weapon, even a strategic objective when it runs out.

But the shortage is there, accelerated by drought and climate change: nearly half of humanity lives in regions facing chronic or occasional water shortages.

In Africa, the Middle East, Asia…

This article is for subscribers only.

You have 54% left to discover.

Freedom is also to go to the end of a debate.

Keep reading your article for €0.99 for the first month

I ENJOY IT

Already subscribed?

Login

Source: lefigaro

All news articles on 2022-08-18

You may like

News/Politics 2024-04-14T18:51:47.447Z
News/Politics 2024-04-11T04:44:05.043Z

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.