A new development plan in the so-called "urban area" on the approximately 2000 square meter parking lot between Landgestütsstrasse and Dr.-Henkel-Strasse was presented to the planning and building committee of the city of Erding on Tuesday evening.
Erding - "Urban area" means here, among other things, that residential use is not possible in the buildings on the ground floor on the side of the street.
With a dissenting vote from Cornelia Ermeier (Bündnis 90/Grüne), the draft was approved and the public participation process opened.
After plans for a four-storey building with business premises and two penthouse apartments submitted by the former investors Helmut Sedlmeir and Maximilian Neumayr failed, mainly because of the appropriate dimensions, there is now a new investor, the city master builder Sebastian Henrich consciously "partner". called.
Because he accepted the suggestions of the city with understanding.
A mixed form of apartments, shops, practices and offices is also planned this time, but in a building with different heights.
In the direction of listed villas in the west, the building should be lower.
A pedestrian and cycle path in the north, parking spaces for the shops and an underground car park are also planned.
Inside, an atrium at a height of 4.5 meters is drawn on the plan.
The staggered construction displeased Herbert Maier (Greens), because it creates shadows and stands in the way of the city's "solar welcome culture".
Henrich replied: "It is a misconception to think that we can stipulate that." This decision rests with the investor, who also bears the entrepreneurial risk.
The same applies to the playground issue.
Henrich commented: “We have building spaces in which the investor can move.
We don't know where the children's playground should be."
With regard to the design of the flat roof with greenery, roof terrace or photovoltaic system, Mayor Max Gotz (CSU) commented: "The question arises here, do you want to fulfill the frequently expressed desire for living, or do you prefer a photovoltaic system?"
As far as the staggered height of the building is concerned, Gotz warned: "We have to stick to it now, we can't say something different every time".
He was referring to the rejection of the tall building by the former investors.
The two penthouse apartments had exceeded the height recommended by the State Office for Monument Protection.
other
